Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What US city has the most historic Value
Detroit 4 2.12%
Boston 82 43.39%
Pittsburg 0 0%
Atlanta 2 1.06%
St Louis 2 1.06%
New Orleans 15 7.94%
Chicago 4 2.12%
NYC 22 11.64%
LA 4 2.12%
Philadelphia 50 26.46%
Other 4 2.12%
Voters: 189. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-09-2013, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,935,751 times
Reputation: 8365

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton Sux View Post
This sounds like it was cut & pasted from some promotional brochure.
Um, ok...thanks? Did you have a point to make orrrrr?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2013, 12:25 PM
 
Location: "Daytonnati"
4,241 posts, read 7,176,546 times
Reputation: 3014
I notice Philalphia isnt even on the poll in the thread header. Why are we even discussing the place?

If the Philalphia posters want their city to compare they should parent their own poll thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2013, 12:26 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,148 posts, read 39,404,784 times
Reputation: 21232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton Sux View Post
Sure it is....this is an internet forum. It's all about opinion.


...that being said, sorry, Philly just doesnt do it for me the way Boston and New Orleans do. Didn't seem that quaint from what I saw, compared to Boston. New Orleans is just special due to its colonial history, and that the French Quarter survived and didnt become the "downtown" (the "American Quarter" became their downtown).

Anyway, heh, touchy people...
Try Society Hill and Old City neighborhoods the next time you're in town. It's pretty fun to just wander the streets and it's almost disgustingly quaint.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2013, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,935,751 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton Sux View Post
I notice Philalphia isnt even on the poll in the thread header. Why are we even discussing the place?

If the Philalphia posters want their city to compare they should parent their own poll thread.
You'll also notice that the option with the second most votes is "other". LOL.
And we were discussing it to shed some knowledge on ignorant posters like yourself.

You realize that it was you that started the recent discussion on Philly, right? SMH lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2013, 12:40 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,148 posts, read 39,404,784 times
Reputation: 21232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlite View Post
Oh no you don't. Los Angeles' history of European based settlement dates back to 1776, when the pueblo was first established there (they had to move it because of flooding). The Los Angeles Plaza--now known as the El Pueblo de Los Angeles State Historic Park--dates back to the 1830's, though it certainly has been much modified. The city has just restored Pico House, a large, four story structure built as a hotel in 1870.

LA experienced its first of many booms in the 1880's and there are larger number of buildings from that period. Angelino Heights and Pasadena, which was an early focus of settlement, are particularly strong in these. There are also strong concentrations of arts and crafts era houses, especially along the Arroyo Seco in Pasadena. Often beautiful courtyard apartment buildings were built in the early 20th Century, especially in Pasadena, Silver Lake, and West Hollywood. LA has probably the country's the best concentration of art deco buildings, particularly in Downtown LA and along the Wilshire Corridor.

In 2002, the city of LA Cultural Affairs Department published Landmark LA, which provides information on the 700 official historic-cultural monuments designated in the city of LA.
California, Alto and Baja, was a very sparsely settled backwater for New Spain so there really isn't that much colonial history for there to be a lot of remnants (Mexico does have a ton of amazing history though in its central regions and is way underrated by most people on that count). There is a lot of history to LA, but most of it is of a much later sort than that of the Eastern seaboard which was actually a place of intensive early settlement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2013, 01:09 PM
 
Location: Florida and the Rockies
1,970 posts, read 2,236,076 times
Reputation: 3323
Baltimore and Philadelphia should be on the list.

Absent those choices, I would vote for Boston then New York.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2013, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Shaw.
2,226 posts, read 3,856,695 times
Reputation: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
the first residential street in the US
Elfreth's Alley is technically the oldest continually-inhabited residential street in the U.S. Obviously there are older streets even in Philadelphia. It's also perhaps the best-preserved example of working-class 18th century housing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2013, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,935,751 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgm123 View Post
Elfreth's Alley is technically the oldest continually-inhabited residential street in the U.S. Obviously there are older streets even in Philadelphia. It's also perhaps the best-preserved example of working-class 18th century housing.
Yes, you are correct; thanks for the clarification .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2013, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Shaw.
2,226 posts, read 3,856,695 times
Reputation: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
Yes, you are correct; thanks for the clarification .
Your description is what they call themselves, so you're not wrong.

I haven't been there since I was a kid, but I'm going to assume that it's unchanged because that's kind of the point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2013, 01:46 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,462,326 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by slengel View Post
many major cities pre-date the united states: new york, boston, philadelphia, baltimore, st. louis, pittsburgh, and many smaller cities.
And San Francisco, but by just 6 days (June 29, 1776).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top