Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What US city has the most historic Value
Detroit 4 2.12%
Boston 82 43.39%
Pittsburg 0 0%
Atlanta 2 1.06%
St Louis 2 1.06%
New Orleans 15 7.94%
Chicago 4 2.12%
NYC 22 11.64%
LA 4 2.12%
Philadelphia 50 26.46%
Other 4 2.12%
Voters: 189. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-06-2013, 06:31 PM
 
14,021 posts, read 15,022,389 times
Reputation: 10466

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by polo89 View Post
Nice. LA is one of the oldest cities in the US. Alot of Spanish history. Not alot of history of the Anglo-Saxon variation, which is why most of C-D discounts it, as only Anglo history counts on C-D.
Well Boston, New York, and Philly are nearly 100 years older, and they were larger cities for longer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-08-2013, 01:27 PM
 
Location: "Daytonnati"
4,241 posts, read 7,176,546 times
Reputation: 3014
Its a toss up btw Boston and New Orleans, but I voted New Orleans due to the non-anglo colonial/cultural legacy and the somewhat unique built environment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2013, 03:18 PM
 
2,664 posts, read 5,635,223 times
Reputation: 853
how u gon put pittsburgh and not put philly
la, atl? this is a joke
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2013, 08:23 PM
 
Location: Shaw.
2,226 posts, read 3,856,695 times
Reputation: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by OleSchoolFool View Post
how u gon put pittsburgh and not put philly
la, atl? this is a joke
Let's just assume it is because this whole thread is basically nine pages of people asking that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2013, 08:27 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,698,612 times
Reputation: 3668
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
Well Boston, New York, and Philly are nearly 100 years older, and they were larger cities for longer.
Nearly 100 years old? LOL. Try 350.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2013, 08:29 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,698,612 times
Reputation: 3668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton Sux View Post
Its a toss up btw Boston and New Orleans, but I voted New Orleans due to the non-anglo colonial/cultural legacy and the somewhat unique built environment.
No Philadelphia? Huh... read up on your American history boy... I mean, the country was only founded here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2013, 11:16 PM
 
Location: Nob Hill, San Francisco, CA
2,342 posts, read 3,990,690 times
Reputation: 1088
Boston
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2013, 11:27 PM
 
932 posts, read 1,945,051 times
Reputation: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343 View Post
Nearly 100 years old? LOL. Try 350.
He said "Nearly 100 years older". LA was settled in 1776 by the Spaniards, at which point, Philadelphia and New York had been settled 140 years prior by the Dutch, and Boston settled 140 years prior by the English.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2013, 01:00 AM
 
940 posts, read 2,027,634 times
Reputation: 742
This country didn't really become a global player until after the civil war (the US wasn't larger than Italy or Great Britain until 1860, France until 1870, and Germany until 1880)

In other words, although many of our cities are quite old, they didn't really resemble the significant world-leading cities we know today until the victorian and later eras. The US became "America" starting in the 1870s, 80s, 90s and 1900s--and so a great deal of our significant history is quite recent.

The century between 1870 and 1970 was as (if not more) significant to our national history as that from 1770 to 1870.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2013, 10:00 AM
 
Location: "Daytonnati"
4,241 posts, read 7,176,546 times
Reputation: 3014
Quote:
No Philadelphia? Huh... read up on your American history boy... I mean, the country was only founded here.
When I think of Philly I think more of ...say....Rocky...than I do history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top