Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-13-2016, 11:27 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by eye state your name View Post
Keep telling yourself that. The rest of us have moved on.
Have you really not read the Constitution? There are quite clearly different levels of qualification for Congress and POTUS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-13-2016, 11:34 AM
 
8,420 posts, read 7,425,009 times
Reputation: 8769
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes, and that would qualify him for Congress according to the Constitution.

However, the Constitutional requirement for POTUS is more than that. One must be a natural born citizen.
Re-read my post. Try to read for content this time.

Pay particular attention to where I pointed out that you declared the State Department to be an authority upon the matter of U.S. citizenship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2016, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,081 posts, read 51,259,863 times
Reputation: 28330
I haven't been a big proponent of this birther business with Cruz except that I enjoyed the irony of it all. This morning, though, I saw a piece on CNN that made it clear that the "framers" back in the 1790s clarified that foreign born citizens were not "natural" born citizens. One must be natural born to be eligible. Cruz is not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2016, 11:35 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
And since the State Department is qualified to pass judgement on citizenship
They're not qualified to do so. They just advise according to current law. There is NO current law stating that those born abroad to US citizen parents are NBCs.

The only Federal Statute that declared those born abroad to US citizen parents to be considered the same as NBCs was repealed in 1795.

The last attempt (in 2004) to declare those born abroad to US citizen parents to be NBCs for Constitutional Presidential eligibility purpose never made it out of the Senate Judiciary Committee and didn't pass. Therefore, it never became law.

Quote:
SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN."

(a) In General.--Congress finds and declares that the term "natural born Citizen" in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States means--

(1) any person born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof; and

(2) any person born outside the United States--

(A) who derives citizenship at birth from a United States citizen parent or parents pursuant to an Act of Congress
; or

(B) who is adopted by 18 years of age by a United States citizen parent or parents who are otherwise eligible to transmit citizenship to a biological child pursuant to an Act of Congress.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-...bill/2128/text

https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-...28/all-actions
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2016, 11:37 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
Re-read my post. Try to read for content this time.

Pay particular attention to where I pointed out that you declared the State Department to be an authority upon the matter of U.S. citizenship.
I didn't declare them to be the authority. I posted their advisory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2016, 11:42 AM
 
8,420 posts, read 7,425,009 times
Reputation: 8769
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf
And since the State Department is qualified to pass judgement on citizenship...
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
They're not qualified to do so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I didn't declare them to be the authority. I posted their advisory.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Once again , the State Dept DOES in fact have the authority to determine citizenship.
So whom am I to believe? InformedConsent or InformedConsent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2016, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Virginia
6,232 posts, read 3,613,104 times
Reputation: 8964
Anchor babies and Canadian presidents. I'm sure that's what the Framers of the Constitution intended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2016, 11:55 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
So whom am I to believe? InformedConsent or InformedConsent?
The State Dept determines citizenship according to current Federal Statutes. It does not determine NBC status for Constitutional Presidential eligibility, however, which is a higher level of qualification. And the State Dept document I linked in my post implies exactly such.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2016, 12:06 PM
 
8,420 posts, read 7,425,009 times
Reputation: 8769
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
The State Dept determines citizenship according to current Federal Statutes. It does not determine NBC status for Constitutional Presidential eligibility, however, which is a higher level of qualification. And the State Dept document I linked in my post implies exactly such.
Right......

The State Department is an authority on citizenship when it suits InformedConsent, but not when it doesn't.

And just for future reference, it's not technically possible to "imply exactly". It's sort of like saying "vague specifics".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2016, 12:40 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
Right......

The State Department is an authority on citizenship when it suits InformedConsent, but not when it doesn't.
I don't make that determination. The US State Department itself did:

Quote:
The “Act to establish an Uniform Rule of Naturalization”, enacted March 26, 1790, (1 Stat. 103,104) provided that, “...the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born ... out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.”

d. This statute is no longer operative, however, and its formula is not included in modern nationality statutes. In any event, the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statute does not necessarily imply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional purposes.
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf

The US State Dept deferred to Federal Law.

However, there is NO current Federal Law which states that those born abroad to US citizen parents are NBCs.

There was an attempt to define those as such in 2004, but as I already posted, that attempt failed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top