Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-13-2016, 10:08 PM
 
1,676 posts, read 946,250 times
Reputation: 800

Advertisements

http://www.newsweek.com/ted-cruz-can...citizen-415430

Could this be a reason for his falling behind again in Iowa? Either way, he's now making a push for New Hampshire to appeal to libertarians and evangelicals: Ted Cruz prepares a big surprise in New Hampshire - POLITICO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-13-2016, 10:54 PM
 
4,911 posts, read 3,431,904 times
Reputation: 1257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmitri95 View Post
http://www.newsweek.com/ted-cruz-can...citizen-415430

Could this be a reason for his falling behind again in Iowa? Either way, he's now making a push for New Hampshire to appeal to libertarians and evangelicals: Ted Cruz prepares a big surprise in New Hampshire - POLITICO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2016, 11:00 PM
 
Location: Seattle
1,384 posts, read 2,693,873 times
Reputation: 1378
It looks like the pasty, empanada boy Cruz is the Republican establishments relief pitcher.

They held him in reserve to sling dung at Trump, but time is running out and they're getting nervous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2016, 11:33 PM
 
Location: Somewhere
8,069 posts, read 6,975,323 times
Reputation: 5654
Are those the same scholars who never came back from Hawaii after never finding evidence that Obama's birth certificate was fake?

Those "scholars" only exist in Trumpf's head. Cruz has bigger problems that convincing some lunatic birthers that he is qualified to run for president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2016, 11:41 PM
 
Location: Somewhere
8,069 posts, read 6,975,323 times
Reputation: 5654
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyRider View Post
Are these quotes from this thread or from 8 years ago? 8 years ago people were trying to prove he was not born here. There is no way we are going to elect an American president who was born in Canada.
We almost elected McCaine.

Cruz in not gonna win anyway, regardless. He will never get the democrat or independent vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2016, 11:52 PM
 
2,345 posts, read 1,671,237 times
Reputation: 779
Hardball Chris Matthews got it right, Tonight. Ted Cruz was born in Calgary. The U S Constitution is Clear. ANYONE NOT BORN ON USA soil, is not eligible to be President of the USA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2016, 12:06 AM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,881,487 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM05 View Post
Hardball Chris Matthews got it right, Tonight. Ted Cruz was born in Calgary. The U S Constitution is Clear. ANYONE NOT BORN ON USA soil, is not eligible to be President of the USA.

Yes, this is what some legal scholars say that 'natural-born' derived from English common law and meant born with the country, and I don't have a problem with that. What irks me is the birthright citizenship for illegals children. Two natural-born citizens could have a child while working in say Canada or perhaps while stationed over seas in the military (?), and the child is ineligible to be President. An illegal Hispanic can sneak across the border and give birth and that child is conceivably eligible.


"The concept of “natural born” comes from common law, and it is that law the Supreme Court has said we must turn to for the concept’s definition. On this subject, common law is clear and unambiguous. The 18th-century English jurist William Blackstone, the preeminent authority on it, declared natural-born citizens are “such as are born within the dominions of the crown of England,” while aliens are “such as are born out of it.” The key to this division is the assumption of allegiance to one’s country of birth. The Americans who drafted the Constitution adopted this principle for the United States. James Madison, known as the “father of the Constitution,” stated, “It is an established maxim that birth is a criterion of allegiance. . . . [And] place is the most certain criterion; it is what applies in the United States.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2016, 12:21 AM
 
2,345 posts, read 1,671,237 times
Reputation: 779
Is Cruz a "natural born citizen"? Are anchor babies U.S. citizens? FIND OUT HERE - bit.ly/2308Ga2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2016, 12:46 AM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,820,009 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM05 View Post
Hardball Chris Matthews got it right, Tonight. Ted Cruz was born in Calgary. The U S Constitution is Clear. ANYONE NOT BORN ON USA soil, is not eligible to be President of the USA.
This is the perception of the vast majority of American voters.

I'm sure Cruz (and his supporters) will come out with a lot of long-winded, legally twisted arguments to the contrary. But likely will be viewed as sleaze from a snake oil salesman by most.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2016, 12:48 AM
 
Location: pensacola,florida
3,202 posts, read 4,435,584 times
Reputation: 1671
'Some' scholars believe a lot of things.
Some believe George Romney wasn't eligible because he was born in Mexico to two US citizens.
Some believe Mitt Romney wasn't eligible because his father was born in Mexico to two US citizens.
Some believe Barry Goldwater wasn't eligible because Arizona was still a territory when he was born.
Some believe John McCain wasn't eligible because he was born in Panama,to a US Admiral in a US military hospital.
Some believe Barak Obama wasn't eligible because he 'really wasn't born in Hawaii' or because his father was born a british subject as Kenya was a British colony at the time.
Some believe Marco Rubio isn't eligible because his parents weren't citizens yet when he was born in Florida.
They all ran or are running anyway.

Some scholars believe that only those who meet the 'original' conditions and circumstances and customs relevant to 1790 are eligible,therefore Hillary Clinton and Ben Carson are clearly not eligible since there is no way a woman or a black man could have run in 1790.

I think since Trumps mother was born a British subject he shouldn't be eligible either.....well I don't really think that but i'm OK with all the others running too.

Some scholars believe Jeb Bush and the rest of his family,along with many other powerful people aren't human but rather alien/reptilian/human hybrids.....I don't believe it but if proven Jeb Bush likely doesn't qualify either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top