How can Hillary do so many illegal things, and still be in this election? (Attorney, Whitehouse)

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge

If she thought her e-mails were in their proper place of custody, then she didn't violate the law.

The law isnt based upon how one thinks. If you think its ok to molest a child, you cant then go back and use your thinking as a defense..

Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge

She thought she had that authority. As evidenced by her discussing with previous secretaries of state what they had done. They evidently all had that authority. And if Congress passed laws removing that authority, they should have made provisions to provide oversight.

Why don't you tell me who did have the authority?

Which previous secretaries of state, setup home servers, in particular, after obama banned such practices?

[Old Gringo]

Originally Posted by hawkeye2009

1. whitewater
2. options gate
3. travel gate
4. file gate
5. china gate
6. vince foster
7. Benghazi
8. Benghazi cover up
9. facilitating weapons sales to ISIS
10. fomenting muslim revolt in Libya and Egypt
11. email scandal
12. perjury
13. Clinton foundation lying to IRS on returns
14. selling 20% of our uranium to the Russians
15. "pay for play" politics/donations to the foundation
16. high paying speeches for political favors
17. organizing riots at Trump rallies
18. organizing and condoning voter fraud
19. facilitating a rapist
20. committing rape herself
21. using political influence to assist her brother and son in law
22. killing the DNC staffer who provided the emails to Wikileaks
23. killing her physician




That is just the short list- Hillary is a gangster who only cares about money.

Now, please list all the charges filed against Hillary as a result of all the investigations into those 23 years of allegations. And let's not forget the millions of taxpayer dollars consumed by all those "investigations" by frugal Pubs who whimper and whine about wasteful government spending. I won't mention the years spent by Pub congressmen and their staffs "investigatiing" instead of doing their jobs, which is serving the national interest.

Then, if you'd be so kind, list all the convictions resulting from those charges.

Thank you.

[lifeexplorer]

Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge

She thought she had that authority. As evidenced by her discussing with previous secretaries of state what they had done. They evidently all had that authority. And if Congress passed laws removing that authority, they should have made provisions to provide oversight.

Why don't you tell me who did have the authority?

Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge

She believed that she had the same authority as previous Secretaries of State.

You apparently don't understand how authority is given through designation of authority (DOA). Unless she had a piece of paper (DOA) signed by Obama in her hand saying she had such authority, she didn't have such authority. That DOA must be signed, dated, documented, properly archived, and all relevant parties must be notified and they must sent back signed and dated acknowledgement. Later all these would become government records that can't be destroyed. It's no joking matter even in a 5 people small company! To tell the American people, "I thought I had such authority" is freaking ridiculous and a boldfaced lie!

So where's that signed piece of paper?

Let's say for the argument sake, she did have the authority, there's a whole process, documentation and notification one must go through to re-classify information. Did she follow that process? If she didn't, it means she didn't re-classify such information and didn't re-define how some classified information must be preserved, she would still be in violation of the law.

I don't understand why you still defend her.

[lifeexplorer]

Originally Posted by tinytrump

first of all- its about POLICY not law-- she might have broke policy -- not the LAW- and 2nd I have posted it 100 times-- true top secret stuff is NOT sent over the regular internet - it is encrypted - it is done in a skiff location- that is guarded --OMG people - please- please get educated on these matters before you accuse-

Please read Post 155

[wall st kid]

Originally Posted by Old Gringo

Now, please list all the charges filed against Hillary as a result of all the investigations into those 23 years of allegations. And let's not forget the millions of taxpayer dollars consumed by all those "investigations" by frugal Pubs who whimper and whine about wasteful government spending. I won't mention the years spent by Pub congressmen and their staffs "investigatiing" instead of doing their jobs, which is serving the national interest.

Then, if you'd be so kind, list all the convictions resulting from those charges.

Thank you.

OJ wasn't convicted of murder either, so what was the point again?

[Old Gringo]

Originally Posted by wall st kid

OJ wasn't convicted of murder either,

...was he charged and taken to trial?

so what was the point again?

A tiny detail you somehow missed.

[Leo58]

Originally Posted by Mr. In-Between

No matter how bad she is, she's still better than Trump, who is the worst candidate in modern history by lightyears. It's just that simple. Against any other candidate she'd be down by 20 or 30 points, but the GOP nominated Trump and gave her the Presidency.

This is the answer to the OP question. It is very simple. You don't need to argue over whether Hillary is crooked or not.

[Bulldawgfan]

Originally Posted by Old Gringo

Now, please list all the charges filed against Hillary as a result of all the investigations into those 23 years of allegations. And let's not forget the millions of taxpayer dollars consumed by all those "investigations" by frugal Pubs who whimper and whine about wasteful government spending. I won't mention the years spent by Pub congressmen and their staffs "investigatiing" instead of doing their jobs, which is serving the national interest.

Then, if you'd be so kind, list all the convictions resulting from those charges.

Thank you.

I look at it a bit differently. If the right is so inept to not be able to convict her on a single one of those charges .... why would I want them to govern my country?

[DC at the Ridge]

Originally Posted by ringwise

Being a good speaker is no indication of intelligence. And with her brain damage, I'd call her far from intelligent, if she ever in fact was.

And by crafty, I assume you mean "willing to blame everyone else for things that should have been her responsibility"?

Is that what you meant by crafty?

I meant strategically intelligent, as in able to assess a situation, and anticipate how others will respond, in order to obtain the most advantageous results from the situation.

[DC at the Ridge]

Originally Posted by ringwise

I'll ask again - where is the proof of that?

Her actions are the proof of that.