Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Idiot really let a couple of Chinese people take the state to the cleaners with the Lindenberg deal. I think that all he needed was a big smile from the Chinese lady and he was ready to fork over cash.
Please explain? Actually the Democratic party made it clear that even non U.S. citizens, illegal immigrants were more important to the Democrat party than rust belt voters so naturally rust belt voters moved right and voted Republican. What did you expect? Democrats thought they had the rust belt in the bag just like they think they have all African Americans in the bag. As Julia Roberts said in Pretty Woman... Big mistake.
Why does the election for President have to be about "me, me, me." So Trump made lots of claims about what he would do for the rust belt if he won. But it's a much bigger deal to avoid nuclear war, keep the economy running, protect the environment, and get along with our allies. The US will not continue to be a great nation if we don't have a President who can do these things. The Rust Belt voted Trump in, and we'll see if he can bring your jobs back. However, the bigger picture is much more important for our entire country.
Hillary would certainly have been a much better President on these major issues than Trump. And she just may have been able to re-energize the economy to bring jobs to the Rust Belt, as well.
Why does the election for President have to be about "me, me, me." So Trump made lots of claims about what he would do for the rust belt if he won. But it's a much bigger deal to avoid nuclear war, keep the economy running, protect the environment, and get along with our allies. The US will not continue to be a great nation if we don't have a President who can do these things. The Rust Belt voted Trump in, and we'll see if he can bring your jobs back. However, the bigger picture is much more important for our entire country.
Hillary would certainly have been a much better President on these major issues than Trump. And she just may have been able to re-energize the economy to bring jobs to the Rust Belt, as well.
What? lol Yes, there are more important issues than putting man in the women's bathroom. More important things than the wants of NY and CA. And Hillary promised to be Obama 2.0. Obviously Obama 1.0 didn't work out so well for the rust belt and thats why they didn't want Obama 2.0. Pretty simple if you'd look past your nose. Now you get to feel what rust belt voters felt while you worshipped Obama.
Why does the election for President have to be about "me, me, me." So Trump made lots of claims about what he would do for the rust belt if he won. But it's a much bigger deal to avoid nuclear war, keep the economy running, protect the environment, and get along with our allies. The US will not continue to be a great nation if we don't have a President who can do these things. The Rust Belt voted Trump in, and we'll see if he can bring your jobs back. However, the bigger picture is much more important for our entire country.
Hillary would certainly have been a much better President on these major issues than Trump. And she just may have been able to re-energize the economy to bring jobs to the Rust Belt, as well.
Progressives have lavished attention on the poor for over a century. That (combined with other factors) led to social programs targeting them. Means-tested programs that help the poor but exclude the middle may keep costs and tax rates lower, but they are a recipe for class conflict. Remember when President Obama sold Obamacare by pointing out that it delivered health care to 20 million people? Just another program that taxed the middle class to help the poor
Example: 28.3% of poor families receive child-care subsidies, which are largely nonexistent for the middle class. So my sister-in-law worked full-time for Head Start, providing free child care for poor women while earning so little that she almost couldn’t pay for her own. She resented this, especially the fact that some of the kids’ moms did not work.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
