Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-06-2008, 10:19 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,873,039 times
Reputation: 2519

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmarquise View Post
I really want the same people who run the DMV, running health care. government in action.
It is VERY odd to me that those who think the fedgov. is inept and corrupt should decide about their health....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-06-2008, 10:22 AM
 
3,414 posts, read 7,144,723 times
Reputation: 1467
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro View Post
I have spoken to a number of Americans about health care. My wife's family, our friends, other bloggers, people i meet in the USA. I prefer to listen to people who are affected by the system in America rather than the ones who are not. It's easy to say theres no problem when you can afford health care cover. I was in New Orleans recently and if you want to speak to people affected go there. They can't all be wrong or delusional. They are just normal everyday Americans who want health cover.
You cannot claim to know what the majority of Americans are thinking or doing with anecdotal evidence. It's dishonest of you to present that as fact and then jump all over another poster because he doesn't have enough "proof and facts" for you! That was very dishonest and hypocritical of you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2008, 10:28 AM
 
Location: London UK & Florida USA
7,923 posts, read 8,847,521 times
Reputation: 2059
It's a myth that when a Govt. funds the health service that they "control" it. In the UK and Europe, the Govt funds the health service but it is run by the local health authorities. The Govt. has watchdogs to make sure that the NHS is running properly and they take complaints and investigate them. They can also fine or repremand any authority that doesn't run itys health service correctly. The Individual states in America would be responsible for their own health care system. Run to suit the needs of its particular state. At the moment in America the Insurance companies have complete control of your health care and it is finance driven. In the UK it is not driven by profit and it is always striving to improve the healthcare of all citizens. It works and it works well. To say you do not want a UHC because you have to wait for tests etc. is insulting to the millions who cannot even get health care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2008, 10:29 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,873,039 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro View Post
You make assumptions that people out there choose not to buy health cover. Maybe in your circle of friends that happens. The majority of people without health cover DO NOT choose to be without health care.
He is NOT making assumptions, he is actually citing facts.


Quote:
Census Bureau report “Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2005,†puts the initial number of uninsured people living in the country at 46.577 million.

A closer look at that report reveals the Census data include 9.487 million people who are “not a citizen.†Subtracting the 10 million non-Americans, the number of uninsured Americans falls to roughly 37 million.

Quote:
...according to the same Census report, there are 8.3 million uninsured people who make between $50,000 and $74,999 per year and 8.74 million who make more than $75,000 a year. That’s roughly 17 million people who ought to be able to “afford†health insurance because they make substantially more than the median household income of $46,326.
Quote:
The Kaiser Family Foundation, a liberal non-profit frequently quoted by the media, puts the number of uninsured Americans who do not qualify for current government programs and make less than $50,000 a year between 13.9 million and 8.2 million.
Quote:
Kaiser’s 8.2 million figure for the chronically uninsured only includes those uninsured for two years or more. It is also worth noting, that, 45 percent of uninsured people will be uninsured for less than four months according to the Congressional Budget Office.
Health Care Lie: '47 Million Uninsured Americans' (http://www.businessandmedia.org/printer/2007/20070718153509.aspx - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2008, 10:32 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,873,039 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro View Post
It's a myth that when a Govt. funds the health service that they "control" it.
Then WHY did DOCTOR Jonathan Fielden, chairman of the British Medical Association's consultants committee say this:

"Political meddling has brought the NHS to its knees."

NHS is on brink of collapse, say consultants | UK news | The Guardian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2008, 10:33 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,873,039 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro View Post
Studies? Studies are just data to be manipulated. Who commissions the study gets the results they want. If we believed every govt study we would believe the pros and cons of every issue. The facts are listening to real Americans on here who are affected by the health care disease of America.
Still no answer to my question about the facts to back up your theory that UHC in Hong Kong is worse than the Health care in America??????????
So if you do not believe studies, then you mustn't believe there is a healthcare crisis here...afterall CERTAIN studies have shown it to be so...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2008, 10:41 AM
 
Location: London UK & Florida USA
7,923 posts, read 8,847,521 times
Reputation: 2059
Have you ever heard of self interest. The views of Dr Fielden is not the views of many eminent doctors in the UK. i trained in the NHS and it isn't perfect but it does do an amazing job. There are Doctors in the UK who would love to earn much more and they feel they could in a private sector health care system. This would be to the detrement of the UK citizen. If he thinks that the NHS is being brought to its knees then he should use his position to change things. He won't and he can't, too many Doctors here believe in the NHS and have seen the American model and definately do not want to go down that road.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2008, 10:43 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,873,039 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro View Post
Have you ever heard of self interest. The views of Dr Fielden is not the views of many eminent doctors in the UK. i trained in the NHS and it isn't perfect but it does do an amazing job. There are Doctors in the UK who would love to earn much more and they feel they could in a private sector health care system. This would be to the detrement of the UK citizen. If he thinks that the NHS is being brought to its knees then he should use his position to change things. He won't and he can't, too many Doctors here believe in the NHS and have seen the American model and definately do not want to go down that road.
He is the CHAIRMAN of the British Medical Association's consultants committee...you stated politics wasn't involved in the NHS,well the CHAIRMAN of this group seems to have a differing opinion...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2008, 10:46 AM
 
Location: London UK & Florida USA
7,923 posts, read 8,847,521 times
Reputation: 2059
What Dr Fieldman was actualy saying beneath his criticism of the govt was that the Govt. didn't have complete control. It had not directed the NHS properly and was beginning to allow private sectors to get too involved in the NHS. He also wants the Doctors to be more in control. The Doctors do not want this. They have enough to do with actual healthcare. They want the Govt to have a bigger role in the finances etc and not less. Dr Fielden seems to contradict himself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2008, 10:49 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,873,039 times
Reputation: 2519
The NHS in Scotland and waiting time goals...I can see why we should all want to emulate such a system....

Quote:
Patients waiting - outpatients

The current national waiting time standard is that patients should not wait longer than 6 months to attend a consultant led new outpatient clinic after being referred by their doctor or dentist. Information from the latest waiting list census suggests close compliance with this standard as no patient with a guarantee had been waiting more than 6 months on 30 September 2006, the same as at 30 June 2006. At 30 September 2005 there had been 12,663 patients waiting more than 6 months.

Quote:
Patients waiting - inpatients and daycases

The current national waiting time standard is that patients should not wait longer than 6 months for admission to hospital for treatment.
Quote:

Patients waiting - diagnostic tests and investigations

Information about the numbers who are waiting and the numbers waiting over 9 weeks are published for the first time on the 'Data Development' pages of this website .The national target is to achieve a maximum waiting time of 9 weeks for eight key diagnostic tests and investigations by the end of 2007
Quote:

Patients seen - accident and emergency departments

Details of performance of core A&E sites are published for the first time on the 'Data Development' pages of this website. The national target is that by the end of 2007 98% of patients should spend no longer than 4 hours in A&E departments before being admitted, discharged or transferred.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top