Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Legacy cities or non legacy
Legacy city 69 69.00%
Non legacy city 22 22.00%
No preference 9 9.00%
Voters: 100. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-23-2015, 11:00 PM
 
Location: Cleveland
3,415 posts, read 5,129,247 times
Reputation: 3088

Advertisements

Legacy cities and non-legacy cities have different advantages and disadvantages. Legacy city refers to a city that largely boomed in the early-mid 20th century. They are mostly in the Northeast and Midwest, have strong cultural fabric, good public transit, rich architecture, and well endowed cultural institutions. They also have higher concentrations of poverty, lower median income, more abandonment, and slow or negative population growth. Examples are Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, Boston, Cleveland, Detroit, Pittsburg.

Non legacy cities boomed more recently, are experiencing rapid growth, have higher median incomes than legacy cities. However, they are lacking in historic architecture, strong cultural institutions, public transit, and walkability.

Which type of city do you prefer and why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-24-2015, 12:00 AM
 
Location: Minneapolis
2,330 posts, read 3,813,173 times
Reputation: 4029
I voted legacy which I think is a no brainer if you love cities. It should be mentioned though that there are a handful of places that share the qualities of both - San Francisco, Washington DC and Minneapolis were all major cities by the early 20th century, and have the institutions to show for it, but still have healthy growth today; Richmond and Savannah are the same thing on a smaller level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 09:28 AM
 
Location: San Antonio
5,287 posts, read 5,791,370 times
Reputation: 4474
Non-legacy for living. New Orleans would be the exception, but just barely since it's still a Sunbelt town that's reinventing itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Østenfor sol og vestenfor måne
17,916 posts, read 24,361,392 times
Reputation: 39038
Legacy city. Atmosphere and history are important to me as is a chronologially diverse architecture. Also, legacy cities tend to be located in my favored climates.

The only real draw of a non-Legacy city for me would be if it were in close proximity to a natural environment that I wanted to explore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 10:06 AM
 
5,985 posts, read 13,127,062 times
Reputation: 4930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleverfield View Post
Legacy cities and non-legacy cities have different advantages and disadvantages. Legacy city refers to a city that largely boomed in the early-mid 20th century. They are mostly in the Northeast and Midwest, have strong cultural fabric, good public transit, rich architecture, and well endowed cultural institutions. They also have higher concentrations of poverty, lower median income, more abandonment, and slow or negative population growth. Examples are Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, Boston, Cleveland, Detroit, Pittsburg.

Non legacy cities boomed more recently, are experiencing rapid growth, have higher median incomes than legacy cities. However, they are lacking in historic architecture, strong cultural institutions, public transit, and walkability.

Which type of city do you prefer and why?
Non legacy cities for me. Although I prefer ones that still have those things you mentioned (cultural institutions, historic architecture, transit, walkability). California cities I think strike the best balance.

Those legacy cities you mentioned are great to visit, but I don't feel like I fit in well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 10:49 AM
 
1,160 posts, read 1,658,894 times
Reputation: 1605
Add St. Louis to the legacy city list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 10:57 AM
 
Location: TOVCCA
8,452 posts, read 15,046,521 times
Reputation: 12532
Love the history aspect of a legacy city, but most of them have crumbling infrastructure which is not being adequately addressed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 02:31 PM
PDF
 
11,395 posts, read 13,422,654 times
Reputation: 6707
Legacy for the history but some of these cities that are experiencing rapid growth are really ahead for the most part.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 09:10 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
783 posts, read 695,857 times
Reputation: 961
I like the traditions but I am not a traditionalist so I am a non-preference person. I think looking at the architecture is beautiful in a legacy city, but the future is bright in a non-legacy city and offers so much to the making of new life and culture. I also think that they are more flexible to try to adapt and build towards a future. Legacy cities are old white men cities. Non-legacy are for the future of the US and hopefully the world. I would like it if non-legacy cities did pay more attention to the artistic nature of their design. We shall see. Hopefully a city like Raleigh will show me something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 09:12 PM
 
7,275 posts, read 5,286,513 times
Reputation: 11477
Born in Boston and have been here my entire life.

For me the answer is a no brainer - Legacy City any day, even though I enjoy modern ones too.

I've been to Quebec City and Montreal many times, and I absolutely love them. Deep Legacy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top