Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-20-2012, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Columbus,Georgia
2,663 posts, read 4,848,198 times
Reputation: 619

Advertisements

Water and land has always been a big issue in Columbus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-20-2012, 03:18 PM
 
999 posts, read 1,551,723 times
Reputation: 233
All you have to do is look at where I've posted on my profile, I don't troll and if I do visit other forums... it's few and far between and always positive in dialogue. You might want to read the thread on your forum about the possible shopping center in Phenix City next to the river... I'm in it, my comments are supportive of the Columbus area... I've been on here for years, I don't troll.

Your map shows nothing but what pre and post consolidated Columbus looked like, with Jacksonville's post consolidated city limits overlaid on top... how does that prove your point? You don't think Augusta's size pre consolidation wasn't about exactly the same? I DO know that Augusta's pre-consolidated city limits were the downtown area (largely commercial, CBD, Medical district)... Your map shows pre-consolidated Columbus as central Muscogee (more residential), away from the downtown area and the Chattahoochee. Kind've odd as most cities city limits are the CBD/downtown area.. but at least that's what your map is showing.

Anyway, I gave you 3 reasons (among others) in summation as to why Augusta consolidated, it's land constricted. But you're fooling yourself if you don't think that ALL cities don't consolidate at least in large part... to get their grubby little hands on that extra tax money. So, your overall point in land acquisition and Columbus having a set of city morals that are unparalleled by any other city is undermined.

What's good for Columbus is good for Augusta, Savannah, Macon, etc... and the same goes the other way around. Competition is a good thing and the state needs more of it IMO as having all the eggs in one basket (Atlanta) isn't the best business model for the future growth of Georgia... but that's just me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2012, 03:41 AM
 
37,892 posts, read 41,998,813 times
Reputation: 27280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Columbuskidd92 View Post
Please don't be a TROLL.Its very clear why they both became consolidated. In Columbus case it was for land mass.
Columbus Consolidated Government - City/County Consolidation: Columbus, Georgia

Wow I didn't know south of downtown was the whole area downtown.
No city and consolidate for "land mass," whatever that means. It's about reduction in duplication of services and expansion of the tax base by increasing the population. Even the link you provided shows that increasing the population was a goal of consolidation for Columbus and Muscogee County:

Quote:
Although consolidation was the primary goal, annexation of 42.5 square miles, containing an estimated 52,000 people, was desired by the city government as a step toward consolidation and as a necessity if the metropolitan population of Columbus was to be reflected in the 1970 census, upon which state and federal grants would be based.
Columbus is no grand exemption in terms of consolidates. All cities and counties that are consolidated do so for the same reasons, and that includes both Columbus and Augusta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2012, 07:57 AM
Status: "Freell" (set 10 days ago)
 
Location: Closer than you think!
2,856 posts, read 4,624,036 times
Reputation: 3138
I'm from GA but this second tier city bashing is really annoying. Who cares who's out in front because all 2nd tier cities are pretty much an uncommon interest to most people besides Savannah. Augusta does have the largest metro. Columbus will probably gain its position as 2nd largest city in the state. Macon may turn around and become something to write home about but in reality it's not that serious....The common issue for the last four years....How come Columbus feels so small?l....How come Macon has so much crime?.....dead horse...

You don't have to beat other cities in the state down to make yours ''appear" better because they all have pros and cons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2012, 08:37 AM
 
37,892 posts, read 41,998,813 times
Reputation: 27280
It's all pretty much a cripple fight and is quite amusing if nothing else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2012, 04:10 PM
RNF
 
141 posts, read 232,820 times
Reputation: 44
Macon consolidated would be at like 120k-160k population. Get er done. IMO all the 2nd tier cities except savannah are the same in the mind of an average person from GA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2012, 12:11 AM
Status: "Freell" (set 10 days ago)
 
Location: Closer than you think!
2,856 posts, read 4,624,036 times
Reputation: 3138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
It's all pretty much a cripple fight and is quite amusing if nothing else.
I know LOL..

I think our 2nd tier cities need to model off of our Border States 2nd tier cities.

Look at Huntsville, Greenville, Knoxville, Chattanooga and maybe Mobile. Those are the class of 2nd tier cities if you ask me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2012, 07:44 AM
 
934 posts, read 1,348,101 times
Reputation: 179
Not Greenville IMO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2012, 08:41 AM
 
999 posts, read 1,551,723 times
Reputation: 233
Greenville is nice... very deserving of being among the cities in that list mentioned. Largest metro, very busy airport, nice parks, revitalized downtown, they attract good jobs... dunno what else they need to do except continue to grow.

But yes, Georgia's second tier cities are behind it's peers for the most part in the Southeast... this has also been my opinion on this site for a while... None of the other second tier cities live within the same state as Atlanta and none of the other second tier peer cities are located in a state with all it's eggs in one basket like Georgia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2012, 09:57 AM
 
934 posts, read 1,348,101 times
Reputation: 179
Greenville is a top tiers city in Carolina passing Columbia (Capital) and Charleston (Coastal).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top