Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
DID it make the money it needed to green light the other projects from Warner Bros??
Speculation is "yes" it has.
The movie topped $500 million this past weekend and there is talk of rushing the sequel into production for release next year (!) with a "Justice League" movie to follow.
"I imagine that we will get introduced to Lex Luthor in the next movie even if he isn't a villain right off - there was an awful lot of "Luthor Corp." stuff flying around."
My opinion in that what Luthor is a interesting person. Firstly: he has many different technical things (authors may create all that lets fantasy), secondly: he lives on the Earth and will guards it (him technical power help him make it), he is an enemy of SuperMan, but is not an enemy of the planet and because they can create a sharp story. Some part of this story was already in other creations. SuperMan is a perfect hero and Luthor is a the other hero, but either protect the Earth.
I don't want it to be Luthor either, but if they do it in an intelligent way (not even close to the way they did it in Superman Returns), I would be for it. Your idea above is a good way to spin it.
If they could pull that off, you leave Doomsday and Darkseid for 3 or possibly 4. Personally, I want to see Darkseid, not Doomsday.
I enjoyed this Superman. Considering it's a story we've all heard a million times over it still kept me involved. I wasn't so crazy about Amy Adams in the Lois Lane role. Not sure if it was just her (the actress) or just her part in the story that I didn't like.
Man of Steel was awful. There are some many wrongs in this movie. No fortress of solitude, no kryptonite (maybe an introduction in the 2nd movie), no secret identity (Clark kent/Kalel-superman) Chris Reeves had an excellent Clark Kent persona. A person would never believe that the Clark Kent that Chris Reeves played was superman. Lois Lane already knows his secret identity. Hell, a Kansas police officer knows that Clark Kent is Superman. (fail). The only thing that was good about this movie was the flashback of young Clark and the musical score that accompanied them. The action scenes went on far too long. The movie had potential but it didn't last long.
Gal Gadot as wonder woman; ben affleck as batman..double fail.. they should have gotten younger actors.
I rented this on BluRay the other day. it SUCKED. I ejected it halfway thru and watched Hancock.
EVERY Superman movie sucks, including the ones with Christopher Reeve - especially the first one.
OH my... You dont like superman do ya?? (I mean at all)
I love the first and 2nd movies (Chris reeve) but nothing else....... (George reeve was OK but chris was the best)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Of course I saw it.
*
