Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-13-2009, 12:12 PM
 
3,235 posts, read 8,715,586 times
Reputation: 2798

Advertisements

This has been said before multiple times but people seem to ignore it. Yes, downstate pays more than it gets back but the policies put forth that create the high tax burden that cause businesses to leave the state are put forth by downstate politicians like that piece of garbage Silver. These policies only work downstate. Without downstate, we could get rid of these policies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-13-2009, 12:58 PM
 
93,269 posts, read 123,898,066 times
Reputation: 18258
Quote:
Originally Posted by garmin239 View Post
This has been said before multiple times but people seem to ignore it. Yes, downstate pays more than it gets back but the policies put forth that create the high tax burden that cause businesses to leave the state are put forth by downstate politicians like that piece of garbage Silver. These policies only work downstate. Without downstate, we could get rid of these policies.
Or could it be done on a county by county or regional basis? Meaning, that the burden would be done in a way that is according to density and could be put into proper perspective. For lack of a good example, but I liken it to the difference in driving requirements that are in the state, because the laws on those terms are put into to place due to variables like population density, transportation options and even the sociology of the areas in which the variation in law takes place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2009, 01:16 PM
 
3,235 posts, read 8,715,586 times
Reputation: 2798
Density would probably make more sense. As far as upstate goes, having the same policies in places like Rochester, Buffalo, Syracuse and Albany would not be fair for places like Plattsburgh or Potsdam
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2009, 05:15 PM
 
93,269 posts, read 123,898,066 times
Reputation: 18258
Quote:
Originally Posted by garmin239 View Post
Density would probably make more sense. As far as upstate goes, having the same policies in places like Rochester, Buffalo, Syracuse and Albany would not be fair for places like Plattsburgh or Potsdam
I guess the difference there would be like how here in Upstate, you can after 9 PM before your 18th birthday if you have the driver's ed training versus someone that might not have the driver's ed training. Meaning, the tax burden would be put into "proper perspective". Hence, my thought of maybe basing the burden based on the county as a possible option and in turn, density will come into play accordingly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2009, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Now in Houston!
922 posts, read 3,861,036 times
Reputation: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckhthankgod View Post
Or could it be done on a county by county or regional basis? Meaning, that the burden would be done in a way that is according to density and could be put into proper perspective. For lack of a good example, but I liken it to the difference in driving requirements that are in the state, because the laws on those terms are put into to place due to variables like population density, transportation options and even the sociology of the areas in which the variation in law takes place.
A good example of one of these laws is the "Scaffold Law", which is a section of NYS labor law that applies special protection to construction workers who are injured from falls. The law basically says that the contractor is strictly liable for any work site fall, even when the contractor follows every single safety guideline and regardless of the negligence of the worker. Worker's comp insurance also provides no protection from liability under this law.

The economic impact of this law is sky-high insurance premiums and construction costs.

It can be argued that the preponderance of high-rise building in the NYC metro area makes construction work exceptionally dangerous, necessitating the law*. However, this same law applies statewide to all contractors and construction sites.

* It can also be argued that OSHA regulations have basically made the 1885 Scaffold Law obsolete, and it remains on the books for the benefit of personal injury lawyers, but that is another discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2009, 11:11 AM
 
9,091 posts, read 19,219,584 times
Reputation: 6967
Quote:
Originally Posted by garmin239 View Post
This has been said before multiple times but people seem to ignore it. Yes, downstate pays more than it gets back but the policies put forth that create the high tax burden that cause businesses to leave the state are put forth by downstate politicians like that piece of garbage Silver. These policies only work downstate. Without downstate, we could get rid of these policies.
Exactly - they could strike their own balance and create policies that work for them

Given the population and money in the city it drives everything in the state and creates policies that absolutely kill upstate to the benefit of downstate

People say things like "without NYC the rest of the state would be no different than Iowa, NH, VT or WV" .... which is exactly the point and a thing that many upstate residents are not opposed to

They aren't looking to have some kind of national influence or great name recognition .... just to be able to live a fairly "simple" life, raise a family, have a steady job and continue to foster and build their local communities
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2009, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Now in Houston!
922 posts, read 3,861,036 times
Reputation: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Laker View Post

People say things like "without NYC the rest of the state would be no different than Iowa, NH, VT or WV" .... which is exactly the point and a thing that many upstate residents are not opposed to

They aren't looking to have some kind of national influence or great name recognition .... just to be able to live a fairly "simple" life, raise a family, have a steady job and continue to foster and build their local communities
Upstate as a separate state would probably be a lot like Wisconsin:
  • Similar population
  • Similar makeup of industrial cities, small cities, farmland, and wilderness
  • Similar climate
  • A Great Lakes/Upper Midwest cultural orientation
  • A big world-class city just to the south
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2009, 11:57 AM
 
9,091 posts, read 19,219,584 times
Reputation: 6967
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpstaterInBklyn View Post
Upstate as a separate state would probably be a lot like Wisconsin:
  • Similar population
  • Similar makeup of industrial cities, small cities, farmland, and wilderness
  • Similar climate
  • A Great Lakes/Upper Midwest cultural orientation
  • A big world-class city just to the south
I can agree with that - especially when you look at other similarities, like diary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2009, 07:54 PM
 
Location: THE THRONE aka-New York City
3,003 posts, read 6,090,865 times
Reputation: 1165
wow i didnt know there was so much resentment for nyc from upstate. If anything i thought upstate would be proud to have a city like that in their state. Guess i was wrong lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2009, 08:16 AM
 
3,235 posts, read 8,715,586 times
Reputation: 2798
People don't resent NYC. They resent NYC politicians
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top