Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
with enough condiments, even soy based "meat" can be tasty.
I make Seitan - and really - it's better tasting than the soy alternatives, by adding spices and quite fun to make. But, by no means, do I think it replaces the real thing. When ever I make it for my son, he'll say "Mom, this is really
good, but I think you need to get a better chicken"
Ugh this whole idea sounds like something out of a cartoon with kids having disgusting school lunches with the stereotypical ugly lunch lady serving it. Lol! Speaking of which:
You're probably right, I'm sure that PETA wackos are part of the Obama base.
This whole idea just grosses me out.
Good meat, raised the old fashioned way, on a farm, will never have an equal in any form. There is nothing like a succulent pork chop, BBQ pork ribs with baked beans, or any other delicious cut of beef or pork.
Let those that want this junk have it, but don't force it down my throat. And that is the real danger with these people; they attempt to force their looney ideas on everyone else.
Who are these people?
Do you have access to any advance information that they are going to try to force it on you?
I think there are an extra 2 letters at the beginning of your name.
I don't know what this new fake meat will be like in the end. I am just assuming that if they are growing it, they may be able to modify it in ways that will make it healthier than natural meat. If they could, why wouldn't they?
For the same reason that McCain and company (codex alimentarius) are attempting to outlaw Vitamin C.
This can't be good for you. Who knows what nasty chemicals it's gonna have! Yuck! Besides, there's already fake meat at the nearest Mother's Market or Whole Foods market.
Why would it have to have nasty chemicals? In fact, one of the benefits would probably be that it has FEWER nasty chemicals than the stockyard nasty-ass beef you're eating now.
People don't really understand science very much, do they?
That's the problem with letting the public weigh in too heavily on those kind of subjects. If you have no background in molecular biology, you're pretty much flying ignorant on this one.
Now I think I will go to an airplane forum and form opinions on throttle manifolds...because I know nothing about airplanes.
And I think this is why cows won't go extinct. There will always be a market for grass fed 'organic' cattle. It's already more expensive now...it'll remain a cottage industry.
Why would it have to have nasty chemicals? In fact, one of the benefits would probably be that it has FEWER nasty chemicals than the stockyard nasty-ass beef you're eating now.
People don't really understand science very much, do they?
That's the problem with letting the public weigh in too heavily on those kind of subjects. If you have no background in molecular biology, you're pretty much flying ignorant on this one.
Now I think I will go to an airplane forum and form opinions on throttle manifolds...because I know nothing about airplanes.
Ok then. Exactly what ingredients do they use? Hmmm?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
