Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How is a mother bending over with her son being close behind her who also happens to be sporting a bit of a woody (look real close) considered '' art''?
This is wrong. It's provocative with the wrong people. Family members should not be doing that.
Why do some people in this thread deny it? It's like your choosing to be oblivious to the obvious.
That's called Photoshop, it is a magical program that can make anything believable.
As Abraham Lincoln once said, "don't believe everything you see on the internet. #photoshop"
What is interesting about the ancient Romans is that 90 % of the entire population was gay/bi. This is because the culture encouraged such lifestyles and relationships. When the culture of Rome changed so did its people, there were no longer gay/bi sexuals in it's civilization. Same thing happened with the Ancient Greeks.
This evidence points to homosexuality being environmental and not genetic. This is also why straight men who go to prison often form same sex attractions and romantic feelings. If sexuality was truly set in stone geneticand unchangeable this wouldn't happen.
Culture and environment determine sexuality. To give another example take women with armpit hair, most American men find it to be a big turn off and could never be attracted to those women. But this was not the case hundreds of years ago where it was the norm, European men actually preferwwomen with hair. Why? Because the environment. Same thing with fat women, we find it disgusting today, but a hundred years ago, and even in certain cultures today, it was a big turn on.
No one wants to admit this though.
This might not go over very well on either side. Sometimes in the development stage things go wrong. Now wrong doesn't equate bad. Things misfire. They don't always come out as the "norm".
On a rare occasion someone will be born with incomplete, tough to decipher sexual organs. In the past a sex was assigned to them. Perhaps since there was no obvious penis it was decided the person would be female. The child was raised female. They were gave dolls to play with, wore dresses and answered to Mary.
Their body as it matured started telling them they were male. No amount of parental influence trying to make them female was able to over ride that.
Now are there times were a child is subjected to things no child should be subjected to and that experience causes them to be what society considers abnormally sexually? Yes. They can equate sex with control and power over someone else because of their experiences but a large majority of homosexuals were not treated any differently than their same sex sibling.
Many years ago in orphanages we allowed some very vile things happen to kids. Some of them became an Albert Fish. It is why I am not going to try and defend Seymour here. I have no idea whether she has went beyond icky pics and maybe things she has done has caused harm to her kids, I do not know that for a fact and I'm not making the claim but we do not have homosexuals today because of creepy parents.
Excellent point, but gays will never address this issue. If sexuality is genetic why is it that such a large group of men, who have never participated nor desired homosexuality prior to their incarceration, engage in homosexuality while in prison and even once they leave prison.
In prison it's power. It's a way to show power. Most do not take up as man and wife in prison and few continue after leaving prison.
In prison it's power. It's a way to show power. Most do not take up as man and wife in prison and few continue after leaving prison.
This is untrue, the majority of ex cons participate in bisexuality, when they leave prison. But they don't see themselves as "gay" they just see it as sex, despite the fact that they engage in those activities with other men. The CDC coined the term, "men who have sex with men" to define this group. Their way of thinking is very similar to how men during ancient Rome viewed sexual relations with men.
All of this information is available to the public, why won't you do the research?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
