Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What intimate relationship is she having with her son? Have you been hiding in her bedroom?
Those are her son's words in an interview defending the pictures.
Since you are defending this so voraciously I figured you read all the articles and interviews from them.
You should at least know about what you are defending..right ?
In prison it's power. It's a way to show power. Most do not take up as man and wife in prison and few continue after leaving prison.
Not always about power. That is rape.
Many men in prison do become legitimate homosexuals. They develop romantic feelings for the same sex, they develop same sex attractions and everything. They break down what were once barriers and change their sexual orientation. Some even become transgendered.
It's not genetic. It's a lifestyle that is developed into or chosen based on environmental and cultural influences.
There is no way around this. Just because society today likes to pretend it's just genetic doesn't make it true. The above was the belief accepted among all psychologists before the gay lobby took over for political power. Ask any psychologist today and they will tell you the same.[/quote]
Homosexuality is clearly based on nurture. There are cultures that don't even know what homosexuality is and they have no words for it. Twin studies show that it's not genetic as well.
Those are her son's words in an interview defending the pictures.
Since you are defending this so voraciously I figured you read all the articles and interviews from them.
You should at least know about what you are defending..right ?
LOL good one. He's just a committed and reflexive defender of all manners of liberal debauchery. It's sad when someone buys the party line wholesale like that.
Sure, I am okay with judging a parent that would disown their child....the more shocking point is that it seems like you wouldn't.
It's very important for non-leftists and non-progressives to understand that the "no judgement!" progressive people don't really mean it. They don't want to be judged for *their* preferences, opinions and actions but they certainly want to keep the option of judging those they deem morally inferior to them.
You're not free to disagree with them but they certainly can disagree with you and won't have a problem loudly proclaiming it.
It's very important for non-leftists and non-progressives to understand that the "no judgement!" progressive people don't really mean it. They don't want to be judged for *their* preferences, opinions and actions but they certainly want to keep the option of judging those they deem morally inferior to them.
You're not free to disagree with them but they certainly can disagree with you and won't have a problem loudly proclaiming it.
oh, you can disagree with them.
just prepare yourself for the inevitable shrieks of 'hater!!!', 'bigot!!!', 'racist!!!', ad nauseum.
It's very important for non-leftists and non-progressives to understand that the "no judgement!" progressive people don't really mean it. They don't want to be judged for *their* preferences, opinions and actions but they certainly want to keep the option of judging those they deem morally inferior to them.
You're not free to disagree with them but they certainly can disagree with you and won't have a problem loudly proclaiming it.
What are you talking about. I'm all for people judging people. I reserve the right to judge the white trash christian parents that kicked my boyfriend out into the streets when he was 15. And I certainly support christians' right to judge gay people and other devil worshippers.
What I do mind is people going out by the masses to vote on those social judgments. While I bear great ill will toward my boyfriend's white trash family, I certainly would never try to legislate how they choose to live their white trash christian lives.
That's the difference between progressive judgment and christian judgment.
Last edited by rosie_hair; 02-14-2014 at 11:16 AM..
What are you talking about. I'm all for people judging people. I reserve the right to judge the white trash parents that kicked my boyfriend out into the streets when he was 15. And I certainly support christians' right to judge gay people and other devil worshippers.
What I do mind is people going out by the masses to vote on those social judgments. While I bear great ill will toward my boyfriend's white trash family, I certainly would never try to legislate how they choose to live their white trash lives.
That's the difference between progressive judgment and christian judgment.
The Civil Rights Act was a vote on social judgements.
The funny thing about stories like this is that no one would ever heard of the offending photo(s) if some puritan didn't raise a moral stink about them and direct everyones attention to them...
Happens every time---some moral majority type just gives away free publicity to whatever offends them.
The Civil Rights Act was a vote on social judgements.
No, it wasn't. It was a legal judgment. You still have the right to hate ******s and *******. You just can't refuse service to the thugs inside your restaurants.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
