PayPal pulls North Carolina plan after transgender bathroom law (employer, employment, illegal)

[Cliftonpdx]

Originally Posted by eqttrdr

Well.. I believe I am a dolphin and you should make considerations for me to use my own dolphin bathroom...

It is called the ocean, go to it my dolphin, be one with your animals.

[BrokeLoser]

Originally Posted by eqttrdr

Well.. I believe I am a dolphin and you should make considerations for me to use my own dolphin bathroom...

to insinuate that I should use the male/female washrooms is racist!!


how far do you want to take this?

Careful, don't make to much sense...that could easily end this pathetic yet entertaining thread.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Cliftonpdx

So basically right wing states, color me shocked.

"New Hampshire, New York and Wisconsin law do not protect gender identity/expression from discrimination in employment, housing or public accommodations."

And MI, OH, VA, PA, FL don't even have laws to protect sexual orientation on top of that. Right wing states only? Hardly.

http://politicalmaps.org/wp-content/...mepage-map.png

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by FinsterRufus

What does that have to do with what we're discussing? This only applies to places where it is illegal to not provide equal accommodations. Otherwise, a transgendered person is not allowed in the facility and your point is moot.

If they are allowed, by law, then they have the same right to get changed as anyone else in there, and your indecent exposure statute would not apply.

We'll just have to run some test cases, then, no? What's the standard of proof that one is in fact a transgender person and not just a sexual predator? Just their "say so?" What protections do MINORS have from unwilling exposure to strangers' opposite sex genitalia?

Parents, etc., WILL fight back on this.

[Cliftonpdx]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

"New Hampshire, New York and Wisconsin law do not protect gender identity/expression from discrimination in employment, housing or public accommodations."

And MI, OH, VA, PA, FL don't even have laws to protect sexual orientation on top of that. Right wing states only? Hardly.

http://politicalmaps.org/wp-content/...mepage-map.png

You're right, even Utah protects gender identification.
https://www.aclu.org/map/non-discrim...nformation-map

[asiandudeyo]

Originally Posted by BrokeLoser

Careful, don't make to much sense...that could easily end this pathetic yet entertaining thread.

The solution is to make a separate restroom for all the bigots.
Case closed.

[jjrose]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

[i]"New Hampshire, New York and Wisconsin law do not protect gender identity/expression from discrimination in employment, housing or public accommodations."
[/url]

NY does cover gender identity discrimination in public accommodations, housing and employment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9_New_...s_%C2%A7466.13


Sexual orientation and gender identity are covered in employment FEDERALLY under title vii.
https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/w...bt_workers.cfm

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Cliftonpdx

You're right, even Utah protects gender identification.
https://www.aclu.org/map/non-discrim...nformation-map

Not in regards to public accommodations, which is WHAT this thread is about. There's a bill that hasn't passed, there's no law.

In fact, In fact, here's a list and the map of states that do not have laws that prevent gender identity/expression discrimination in employment, housing or public accommodations.:

Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Michigan
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
New Hampshire
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

33 states.

http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpo...of-lgbt-people

And, of course, the Federal Government itself does NOT list sexual orientation or gender identity as a protected class.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by jjrose

NY does cover gender identity discrimination in public accommodations, housing and employment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9_New_...s_%C2%A7466.13

A governor's executive action on "policy" is NOT a law. Just like Obama's EOs are NOT law.

Sexual orientation and gender identity are covered in employment FEDERALLY under title vii.
https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/w...bt_workers.cfm

Only in employment by the Federal Government. There is NO coverage in public accommodations in Federal Law.

Please STOP deliberately spreading misinformation.

[Jo48]

There are no Transgender Women? Obviously, they would not use the Men's Urinal but go into the stall and close the door, same as a Transgender Man would do in the Women's Restroom.

Not to get OT, but which should Caitlyn Jenner or Chaz Bono use? Would it bother you to see them in the Women's and Men's Restrooms respectively?