Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
More women than men go to college because quite often women are doing different jobs and many jobs in academia generally lean towards a Master's. Whereas many jobs men do such as in IT and so on don't. They lean a lot on certifications and short term 1 week seminars and so on.
So if all of the women felt like you, there would be a lack of men hypothetically. Agree?
My point is you're still taking status into account whereas men, before feminism, didn't. So the problem with modern era self proclaimed feminists is they're hypocrites and they want their cake and be able to eat it to.
Men date down all of the time and many of them have very good jobs. example : the lawyer dates a paralegal in the office down the streeet. If career women want reversed roles they should be doing what men do not trying to work the system and still date or marry like a 1950's woman.
Are you married or in a relationship? Do you date much?
Are you married or in a relationship? Do you date much?
Do I have to put you on ignore again for being non-intellectual and not bringing anything to the conversation, and start reporting people for trolling again?
I grew up in the days of the feminist movement. What may have started as an honorable movement has morphed into something that is abhorrent to me, as a woman.
Today's young feminists (for the most part) have lost much of the nurturing, feminine side of their nature, and have become strident, aggressive, foul-mouthed, and man-bashing. It's not pretty, and small wonder they have earned the name 'femi-nazis'.
People said the same thing about women who took to the streets to protest the fact that women weren't allowed to vote. They said the same thing when women marched in favor of the ERA.
Women don't desire to be second-class citizens. Being subjugated by men won't make women happy.
Go ahead, refute those claims.
If the women in the thread keep running around the room with their arms flailing around like crazy women a la George Costanza in the Seinfeld, Coco the monkey epsisode, ..then they're just keep going proving their points in that the radical feminism and herd/hive mind mentality is a problem.
Happiness is subjective, dear. There is no way of getting around it.
The study design does not address the "spurious" correlation in any way, shape or form.
As for your "anecdotal evidence" re Amish communities. First of all, you don't really have any anecdotal evidence, all you have is your opinion of how happy Amish women are. YOUR opinion. To support your argument. Secondly, you then manufacture a reason of why Amish women are happy based on their subjugation by men, and then extrapolate this tenuous reasoning to say that all women would be happier if they were subjugated by men.
Human beings are never happy about being subjugated by others.
Women are human beings.
Therefore women are not happy about being subjugated by men.
Now you may argue that women in the past have accepted being second-class citizens, and some were able to be happy despite that status, but that's not the argument you've been pursuing. Rather, your argument rests on how 50% of the human population for some reason desire to be treated as inferior and incompetent. That is the fatal flaw of your position. And you know it is the fatal flaw because it is exactly members of that segment of the human population who have come on to this thread and told you that they don't desire to be treated as inferior and incompetent.
Even compared to some of the nonsense you've written in this thread, this reply is pretty appalling.
For example, if I post the link from earlier, categorically disproving your claim that scientists don't measure happiness, will it really make any difference? Somehow I doubt it. I think you know just how disingenuously you are behaving.
I'll also ignore the diatribe at the end (that has nothing to do with what I said).
Do I have to put you on ignore again for being non-intellectual and not bringing anything to the conversation, and start reporting people for trolling again?
Please, share some more "intellectual" YouTube videos.
If the women in the thread keep running around the room with their arms flailing around like crazy women a la George Costanza in the Seinfeld, Coco the monkey epsisode, ..then they're just keep going proving their points in that the radical feminism and herd/hive mind mentality is a problem.
Your sexual frustration must be through the roof. Fear not--there's a YouTube video for that!
"Radical" feminism is not about writing on the internet. S.C.U.M., anyone?
Last edited by Cantabridgienne; 06-21-2017 at 09:23 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
