Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-07-2011, 12:54 PM
 
10,135 posts, read 27,484,138 times
Reputation: 8400

Advertisements

The reason I pointed out that everyone has a prenup has been amplified by the posts here. It is obvious that not only does everyone have a prenup but almost no one knows what it says. And, here in Ohio, the code and case annotations interpreting the code are hundreds of pages of often conflicting rules. Given this, don't we all see that having a written prenup that the parties understand and agree to is a good idea?

I'm OK if the "bride to be" wants the prenup to say "if we get divorced I get every last dime you have and the horse you rode in on." If the lucky fellow wants to agree with that its his business, but doesn't it make sense to know what the consequence of divorce or death will be given that half of all marriages end in divorce and the rest end in death?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-07-2011, 01:16 PM
 
2,650 posts, read 3,013,003 times
Reputation: 3466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boodhabunny View Post
It's the same in the US. Many men view splitting the asets accumulated during the marriage as "taking them to the cleaners".
WRONG and WRONG! I have no problem splitting what we earned together, nor do many men. It is a truth that some men do, just as some women think that divorce is a good means of enriching their lives as much as possible.

The laws are set up in many states so that your spouse can go after just about anything and often get it. Mine did and did including assests I brought into the marriage which state law says are seperate property and not part of the divisible marital assets EXCEPT..... and thats where you die, the except part. Want to go to court and argue over it? No problem. Just pull out the pen write the check and bingo, there you are in court, making an arguement. Thing is that two days of court will cost you somewhat over 5k BEFORE you get the similar bill from your soon to be ex wifes attorney who of course you are paying for. This means that she need only threaten to force a court date on anything less than 20k in value and you are better off giving it up because you cannot come out ahead. And yes that is the actual number where my attorney advised me to let it go because even a victory would be more expensive than simply walking away from the issue. This of course is based on your assets since the more expensive the thing the more expensive the fight becomes and your minimum value floor to see a possible gain in a fight goes up with the costs of the fight.

I could go on and on but one last thought I have is the owed thing. Some women have this whole well I stayed there and cooked and cleaned and put up with you so you owe me. News flash, many men have just as much time in as their spouses do, actual hours of work in and out of the home, sometimes more. If we owe you then you also owe us. Or neither owes the other anything. You dont get to have it both ways, either something is owed or it is not. If something is owed both parties owe.

We are not going to agree here and I will give you the last word as to that. To the thread there is not a chance I would marry without a pre nup knowing what I know now even if I were young and starting out. You have no idea what is going to be up on the table till you get there, learn after the fact and you will be very, very sorry and at the mercy of someone who may or may not choose to nail you to a cross. Unless of course you're a woman who is taking advantage of the system set in place by Divorce Inc. Then by all means, please make use of a system set up more to enrich lawyers than to protect two parties in the dissolution of marriage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 01:24 PM
 
Location: The D-M-V area
13,691 posts, read 18,458,970 times
Reputation: 9596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerby View Post
You are supposed to have an undying trust, for better or worse. Going into a marriage with a prenuptial agreement is really saying "I dont buy into the for better or worse till death do us part". People say "Well you just protect yourself with a prenup".. You shouldnt be marrying that person in the first place then!
Got nothing to do with lack of trust, it's got to do with asset protection for those with a considerable amount of assets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 01:38 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
29,747 posts, read 34,404,163 times
Reputation: 77109
I miss Redisca when threads like these pop up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 01:59 PM
 
Location: Tucson
42,831 posts, read 88,178,761 times
Reputation: 22814
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunshineleith View Post
Is it seriously that common in the USA?
I don't think so. I've seen many posts from people who "would" do it, but not even one from somebody who "has" done it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 02:15 PM
 
Location: NC
179 posts, read 294,375 times
Reputation: 119
marriage is a contractual agreement and should be treated as such.

love may ebb and flow. people change. etc etc...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 02:15 PM
 
Location: Wherever women are
19,012 posts, read 29,728,231 times
Reputation: 11309
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulysses61 View Post
Paul McCartney didn't believe in a pre-nup. Four years after he married Heather Mills, she took him to the cleaners to the tune of 40 million bucks. Total stupidity on his part, but he said that pre-nups were "not romantic."
That was her fee for sleeping with a hideous jabroni no woman probably wants to sleep with, if not for the money. Poor Heather, well earned at least
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Washington, DC
4,320 posts, read 5,140,085 times
Reputation: 8277
Prenups take the prostitution out of marriage.

[that's an original quote, and a good one, thanks]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 03:10 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
14,229 posts, read 30,044,201 times
Reputation: 27689
If you are both young and have nothing, there's nothing to pre-nup.

If you are older and have assets going into a marriage, it just makes sense. Neither your SO, nor his/her heirs should have any claim on what you had BEFORE you were married. A pre-nup just keeps things straight, honest, and out in the open.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2011, 08:28 PM
 
3,588 posts, read 5,730,857 times
Reputation: 4792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerby View Post
You are supposed to have an undying trust, for better or worse. Going into a marriage with a prenuptial agreement is really saying "I dont buy into the for better or worse till death do us part". People say "Well you just protect yourself with a prenup".. You shouldnt be marrying that person in the first place then!
IMHO, Even back in biblical times, marriage wasn't 100% about love. There were some business considerations thrown in, too. (The dowry offered by the groom to the bride's father comes to mind, along with arranged marriages for the children of two powerful families)

Today, there are so many couples entering into second marriages with children from the prior marriage, having a prenup to protect their rights is considered a financially responsible thing to do.

If the occasion arose and it was necessary, I would sign a fairly written prenup. I don't expect to "get a slice of a pie I didn't bake" unless those were my intended husband's wishes. Whatever assets I bring into a second marriage, I want to make sure my children are provided for, and I would expect it to be the same if hubby has children from a prior marriage.

No one says anything about husbands and wives having life insurance policies on each other. It's kind of the same thing, to me. Neither spouse sputters indignantly, "What? you don't trust me to provide for myself should your passing precede mine?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top