Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-03-2013, 04:51 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,389,418 times
Reputation: 4113

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mejsito View Post
^^^ Here

/thread
I'm guessing you didn't bother to click on that link
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-03-2013, 07:45 AM
 
91 posts, read 97,709 times
Reputation: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
I'm guessing you didn't bother to click on that link
Yes I did. Click on this Link First Gospel of the Infancy of Jesus Christ

The manuscript of the Coptic text (CG II), found in 1945 at Nag Hammadi, Egypt, Thomas's Gospel of the Infancy of Jesus Christ starts our look at the Gnostic gospel by establishing it was written to the Israelites alone and then expands on some lesser-known miracles of our Savior. Discover why Jesus Christ formed twelve sparrows of clay to gave them life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2013, 07:55 AM
 
91 posts, read 97,709 times
Reputation: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalAngel2009 View Post
That's a fabrication. Jesus was never married. He devoted his life to God. Read his testimony... written by the one and only.

p. 5 Description of Birth and Life of Jesus Up to the Time of His Public Ministry
The history of the marriage law of Christianity is not valid as it has come down through centuries of traditional customs, philosophies, and man-managing; especially through channels which have corrupted almost every other doctrine and ordinance of a sacred gospel. The laws of the marriage covenant have become as perverted as any other part of our religious history. Through the traditions and assumptions of men, celibacy became not only an accepted doctrine of the Church for men and women, but even for Christ!

Fundamentally the question is not "What proof do we have that Jesus was married ?" But rather, "where is there any proof that celibacy was a doctrinal law of God?”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2013, 07:51 PM
 
1 posts, read 627 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danite View Post
Another thing to remember is that the Bible we have was filtered through the early Catholic church, and thanks to Augustus celibacy was considered superior over the congress of man and woman and matrimony. Any text that would explicitly describe Jesus' matrimonial relationship with a woman or women would be excluded from the canonized texts we now have as a matter of course.
The Catholic church didn't filter the scriptures. Please don't say things like that without evidence to back it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2013, 12:07 AM
 
Location: South Africa
5,563 posts, read 7,216,247 times
Reputation: 1798
Quote:
Originally Posted by The debater View Post
The Catholic church didn't filter the scriptures. Please don't say things like that without evidence to back it up.
What was the council of Nicea then? The poster you responded to is correct but it goes against what you have been spoon fed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 07:52 AM
 
91 posts, read 97,709 times
Reputation: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by The debater View Post
The Catholic church didn't filter the scriptures. Please don't say things like that without evidence to back it up.

The fact that there are so many English Bible translations is both a blessing and a problem. It is a blessing in that the Word of God is available to anyone who needs it in an easy-to-understand, accurate translation. It is a problem in that the different translations can create controversy and problems in Bible studies, teaching situations, etc. The differences between the translations can also be a subject of great division within the church body.

Humanly speaking, the Bible was written by approximately 40 men of diverse backgrounds over the course of 1500 years. Isaiah was a prophet, Ezra was a priest, Matthew was a tax-collector, John was a fisherman, Paul was a tentmaker, Moses was a shepherd, Luke was a physician. Despite being penned by different authors over 15 centuries. The authors all present different perspectives, but they all proclaim the same one true God, and the same one way of salvation—Jesus Christ (John 14:6; Acts 4:12). Few of the books of the Bible specifically name their author.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 08:28 AM
 
Location: South Africa
5,563 posts, read 7,216,247 times
Reputation: 1798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danite View Post
Humanly speaking, the Bible was written by approximately 40 men of diverse backgrounds over the course of 1500 years. Isaiah was a prophet, Ezra was a priest, Matthew was a tax-collector, John was a fisherman, Paul was a tentmaker, Moses was a shepherd, Luke was a physician. Despite being penned by different authors over 15 centuries. The authors all present different perspectives, but they all proclaim the same one true God, and the same one way of salvation—Jesus Christ (John 14:6; Acts 4:12). Few of the books of the Bible specifically name their author.
This part is not entirely true. The origin of the authors or the gospels are not known and they were not 1st hand accounts nor were they disciples.

As for the OT, there seems to be consensus Moses wrote nothing personally if he existed at all. It is written in the third person. That is pretty evident by the preambles of "And the Lord said unto Moses...."

There are ideas that Paul's stuff was the work of Jerome and that Paul was a fictitious character.

Most of what you read was translated from the Latin Vulgate which itself is based on dubious claims. There are known add ons like in the Epistles attributed to John supporing the trinity doctrine " ..and these three are one" two verses added after the fact. Do some research and test if what I say is wrong or right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Northeastern US
20,007 posts, read 13,486,477 times
Reputation: 9944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danite View Post
The differences between the translations can also be a subject of great division within the church body.
My favorite was 1 Samuel 20:20:

KJV: "Thou son of a perverse, rebellious woman!"
The Living Bible: "You son of a b__ch!"

I think the resulting kerfuffle caused them to revise it in later printings to "You son of a nobody!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danite View Post
Despite being penned by different authors over 15 centuries. The authors all present different perspectives, but they all proclaim the same one true God, and the same one way of salvation—Jesus Christ
This is manifestly not anywhere near as true as you make it out to be, else there would not be some 40,000 Christian denominations. I will grant you that some minimal consensus is required to call them all Christian, probably that Christ is the central character and that he is divine (for some given definition of 'divine') and that god is benevolent at least on his good days and seeks some kind of congress with mankind.

The truth is that it is written ambiguously enough that it can be molded and cherry picked as needed by different societies and times and eve the personality of different preachers.

Is god angry, judgmental, and punishing? Is he gentle, kindly and loving? Would Jesus toss over tables and take a whip to us if he were here today or would he be meek and mild and gentle? I have heard all these ideas and many more advanced in the name of Jesus and on the basis of scripture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 12:01 PM
 
Location: The Great West
2,084 posts, read 2,622,789 times
Reputation: 4112
I think the most pressing issue is...is Shapeshifting Jesus cooler than Raptor Jesus?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 12:31 PM
 
91 posts, read 97,709 times
Reputation: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeekerSA View Post
This part is not entirely true. The origin of the authors or the gospels are not known and they were not 1st hand accounts nor were they disciples.

As for the OT, there seems to be consensus Moses wrote nothing personally if he existed at all. It is written in the third person. That is pretty evident by the preambles of "And the Lord said unto Moses...."

There are ideas that Paul's stuff was the work of Jerome and that Paul was a fictitious character.

Most of what you read was translated from the Latin Vulgate which itself is based on dubious claims. There are known add ons like in the Epistles attributed to John supporing the trinity doctrine " ..and these three are one" two verses added after the fact. Do some research and test if what I say is wrong or right.

Here are the books of the Bible along with the name of who is most assumed by biblical scholars to be the author, along with the approximate date of authorship:

Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy = Moses - 1400 B.C.
Joshua = Joshua - 1350 B.C.
Judges, Ruth, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel = Samuel/Nathan/Gad - 1000 - 900 B.C.
1 Kings, 2 Kings = Jeremiah - 600 B.C.
1 Chronicles, 2 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah = Ezra - 450 B.C.
Esther = Mordecai - 400 B.C.
Job = Moses - 1400 B.C.
Psalms = several different authors, mostly David - 1000 - 400 B.C.
Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon = Solomon - 900 B.C.
Isaiah = Isaiah - 700 B.C.
Jeremiah, Lamentations = Jeremiah - 600 B.C.
Ezekiel = Ezekiel - 550 B.C.
Daniel = Daniel - 550 B.C.
Hosea = Hosea - 750 B.C.
Joel = Joel - 850 B.C.
Amos = Amos - 750 B.C.
Obadiah = Obadiah - 600 B.C.
Jonah = Jonah - 700 B.C.
Micah = Micah - 700 B.C.
Nahum = Nahum - 650 B.C.
Habakkuk = Habakkuk - 600 B.C.
Zephaniah = Zephaniah - 650 B.C.
Haggai = Haggai - 520 B.C.
Zechariah = Zechariah - 500 B.C.
Malachi = Malachi - 430 B.C.
Matthew = Matthew - A.D. 55
Mark = John Mark - A.D. 50
Luke = Luke - A.D. 60
John = John - A.D. 90
Acts = Luke - A.D. 65
Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon = Paul - A.D. 50-70
Hebrews = unknown, mostly likely Paul, Luke, Barnabas, or Apollos - A.D. 65
James = James - A.D. 45
1 Peter, 2 Peter = Peter - A.D. 60
1 John, 2 John, 3 John = John - A.D. 90
Jude = Jude - A.D. 60
Revelation = John - A.D. 90
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top