Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Other than the fact that they have not provided a single, authoritative and empirical test back by robust methodologies and still call their guesswork "Science;" I would say the only thing it could hurt would be my intelligence.
Have you even looked? Your answer suggests not therefore limiting your intelligence to a biased view and therefore closedminded.
Have you even looked? Your answer suggests not therefore limiting your intelligence to a biased view and therefore closedminded.
Alright... I'm going to look... I can't wait to see all these empirical tests on the site!!! These guys are going to win a Nobel Prize! I'm sure of it!!!
No because other religions are just theories while Christianity is fact.
Do you know what a "fact" is? Your beliefs are not factual. There is no body of evidence capable of being subject to peer review.
Come on, Robin. Time to fly from the nest.
Quote:
Because the Christian view of creationism lines up with scientific evidence.
Actually, in court case after court case, intelligent design / creationism have had opportunities to present evidence of their claims as a valid scientific theory.
None have been able to do so.
Quote:
This is your opinion, but all religions are not equal, Christianity is superior to all because we have Jesus Christ, God in the flesh, and plenty of scientific evidence for our beliefs.
Who did Christ claim superiority over? Find Christ and you will find the wisdom of Christ in all spiritual paths.
Have you ever been to a coalmine? Do you know they have found cups, hammers, furniture, coalified animals, trees that are partially coalified?
Have you seriously looked at the sedimentery layers around the world? They are rather consistant.
Do you realize that there is an element found in granite that could only be there if it cooled instataniously?
There are plenty of creation evidence websites with plenty of information and evidence if you are willing to look. But if you are like more evolutionists then you will be too cloeminded to see the truth.
Absolutely irrelevant and doesn't support creationism one bit.
Ever consider that you're reverse engineering your "facts"? You start with a firm belief that your religious book is infallible. As such, you seek evidence to support your belief. It is a completely faulty approach to science.
Why is it so hard to accept that there is a sentient life force and there is also the process of evolution? Why must it always be one or the other?
Hey, Robin... I'm having a hard time finding the "Robust Methodologies" section... Could you point me in the right direction??? It's just... I don't know... Amidst all the garbage it's hard to find it... Thanks Buddy!
So you are all saying that unless he participated in a school you approve of he is not credible? So you are all reputable scientists then? You do realize that he brings in plenty of scientists who agree or even disagree with his discoveries dont you? Well I guess since yall are all so much smarter than those who actually get their hands dirty then there is no discussion with any of you. I told you you would not accept my evidence because you are too closedminded, well I was there a few years back until I actually looked into all the evidence and opened my mind.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.