Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-09-2015, 01:26 PM
 
14,466 posts, read 20,648,603 times
Reputation: 8000

Advertisements

Sen. Elizabeth Warren Introduces Bill Providing One-time Payment of $581 to Social Security Beneficiaries, Veterans | APWU
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-09-2015, 01:34 PM
 
Location: prescott az
6,957 posts, read 12,060,189 times
Reputation: 14245
LOL Not a chance in hell, JMHO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2015, 01:37 PM
 
14,466 posts, read 20,648,603 times
Reputation: 8000
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhxBarb View Post
LOL Not a chance in hell, JMHO.
No chance in hell or no chance in Washington, D.C.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2015, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Backwoods of Maine
7,488 posts, read 10,487,112 times
Reputation: 21470
Elizabeth Warren is not taken very seriously by much of anybody. Thank God for some things!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2015, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,447,687 times
Reputation: 5047
Regardless of the source, I like the idea, and I like the reason for doing it. From the article:

Quote:
The one-time payments to Social Security beneficiaries would be funded by eliminating the CEO performance pay tax break. The revenue gained from closing the tax loophole would be dedicated to Social Security, strengthening the long-range projected solvency of the Social Security Trust Fund.
If you're unfamiliar with the CEO performance pay tax break, just search that phrase.

I also like this:

Quote:
The Alliance is also working to make Congress require the Social Security Administration to base future COLAs on the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly (CPI-E), which much more accurately reflects the cost of things retirees purchase, including health care and housing.
That would make a substantial difference, since we know that what we have to spend money on changes as we age ... especially health care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2015, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,969,475 times
Reputation: 15773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nor'Eastah View Post
Elizabeth Warren is not taken very seriously by much of anybody. Thank God for some things!
and that would be because...?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2015, 02:52 PM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,798,443 times
Reputation: 6550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nor'Eastah View Post
Elizabeth Warren is not taken very seriously by much of anybody. Thank God for some things!
And how many incumbent Senators have you unseated? I take her far more seriously than anonymous C-D posters (so yes, you should take her more seriously than me).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2015, 03:08 PM
 
Location: in the miseries
3,577 posts, read 4,509,499 times
Reputation: 4416
Eliz Warren is in favor of spend, spend, spend.

Decries high tuition, but doesn't address huge salaries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2015, 03:15 PM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,798,443 times
Reputation: 6550
Quote:
Originally Posted by luvmyhoss View Post
Eliz Warren is in favor of spend, spend, spend.

Decries high tuition, but doesn't address huge salaries.
Really?
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nat...FUP/story.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2015, 03:42 PM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,969,475 times
Reputation: 15773
Quote:
Originally Posted by luvmyhoss View Post
Eliz Warren is in favor of spend, spend, spend.

Decries high tuition, but doesn't address huge salaries.
If you want to create jobs to get people off govt assistance, which I'm sure you do, you have to spend. Spending isn't a bad thing if the larger problems like dependence are fixed, and that would "trickle up" to the wealthy.

Second part of your second sentence: yes, she does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top