Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Downtown Brooklyn due to density and height. I like that Brooklyn is now desirable. It will be interesting to see Charlotte have a super tall.
Cincinnati, OH or Bellevue, WA?
Bellevue's is fantastic for a Satellite City, It's Skyline could go one up with some Mid Size Metros, I like it's Modern feel
But Cincinnati is more of a Classic Dense Skyline with more distinctive buildings instead of a bunch of Glass boxes, I Like that Tower with the Crown and that Triangle Trapezoid Looking building across the river, Add in the Stadiums and Natural Setting and Cincinnati for the Win
Bellevue's is fantastic for a Satellite City, It's Skyline could go one up with some Mid Size Metros, I like it's Modern feel
But Cincinnati is more of a Classic Dense Skyline with more distinctive buildings instead of a bunch of Glass boxes, I Like that Tower with the Crown and that Triangle Trapezoid Looking building across the river, Add in the Stadiums and Natural Setting and Cincinnati for the Win
Portland Oregon or Nashville skyline
I picked Nashville. Looked bigger and more sense and still adding towers even though Portland has 1 or 2 taller buildings and better background scenery. Rochester MN or Duluth MN?
I picked Nashville. Looked bigger and more sense and still adding towers even though Portland has 1 or 2 taller buildings and better background scenery. Rochester MN or Duluth MN?
I like Rochester's a bit more, but close. Duluth has a pretty setting on the lake.
I like Rochester's a bit more, but close. Duluth has a pretty setting on the lake.
Chattanooga, TN or Asheville, NC?
I was looking over both cities, and to me neither city has as much density as I prefer. Ditto with the urbanity, and to further my point both cities could stand to build a few more(and hopefully distinctive, in their designs) taller highrises. This said, I've seen other cities brought up in this thread in the past that were less dense, vs. these 2 cities. But for the smaller size of these 2 cities, I do like the cores in both of these 2 cities. I do like how Chattanooga is trying to do more infill housing developments, along with those river views, bridges, and the river showing up along with seeing nearby mountains. While Asheville does have a few older buildings, I really like myself.
This is a very tough call for me, but I'll slightly go with Chattanooga when I look at all the various factors of their appearance. As it has a little of each of the things I like (river views, river parks, bridges, and some old and new buildings). It's almost like a more southerly version (albeit smaller), of Pittsburgh.
For the newest one, I'll go with Columbus, as it's skyline and taller buildings look a little more defined.
I was looking over both cities, and to me neither city has as much density as I prefer. Ditto with the urbanity, and to further my point both cities could stand to build a few more(and hopefully distinctive, in their designs) taller highrises. This said, I've seen other cities brought up in this thread in the past that were less dense, vs. these 2 cities. But for the smaller size of these 2 cities, I do like the cores in both of these 2 cities. I do like how Chattanooga is trying to do more infill housing developments, along with those river views, bridges, and the river showing up along with seeing nearby mountains. While Asheville does have a few older buildings, I really like myself.
This is a very tough call for me, but I'll slightly go with Chattanooga when I look at all the various factors of their appearance. As it has a little of each of the things I like (river views, river parks, bridges, and some old and new buildings). It's almost like a more southerly version (albeit smaller), of Pittsburgh.
For the newest one, I'll go with Columbus, as it's skyline and taller buildings look a little more defined.
Reno, NV, or Spokane, WA?
Reno due to more impressive buildings and more compact skyline.
Portland. Bigger, taller and more sense. San Antonio or Phoenix?
Both are underwhelming, Phoenix has the stronger skyline. It has more impressive buildings and unique setting.
Orlando, FL or Birmingham, AL?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
