Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which megapolis would come first?
Texas triangle 109 52.91%
Piedmont Atlantic 97 47.09%
Voters: 206. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-21-2010, 01:04 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,260 posts, read 8,760,563 times
Reputation: 693

Advertisements

Texas Triangle
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2010, 01:06 PM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,927,598 times
Reputation: 4565
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeaconJ View Post
Actually you don't even pass through Rock Hill or Fort Mill driving between Charlotte and Atlanta...isn't Rock Hill on the way to Columbia?

It seems like some people are judging the nature of certain areas by what is visible from the highway - I know I tend to do that as well. Keep in mind that most urban/suburban development ISN'T visible from the highway and areas can be very built up just beyond the trees.
I see, but I-35 is the same way(minus the trees), alot of I-35's urbanization is visible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 01:08 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,514 posts, read 33,519,512 times
Reputation: 12147
Quote:
Originally Posted by polo89 View Post
Yeah, to echo what Spade said, the map looks older. The I-35 corridor is ALOT more interconnected than what that map suggest. What about Beaumont and some of the other mid-sized cities sin East Texas? The Piedmont map seems to have EVERY city and town in-between.
I think the Beaumont Houston thing is correct though. Beaumont is simply not growing and there is about 60 miles of rural land between the two areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 01:13 PM
 
4,843 posts, read 6,099,045 times
Reputation: 4670
Quote:
Originally Posted by jluke65780 View Post
Exactly. I-35 corridor is a better comparion because it's structured similarly to the Piedmont area (Is Nashville really part of it?). The Texas Triangle is about the size of Georgia and is structured differently than the Piedmont region.
LOL Is OKC part of The Texas Triangle? They aren't part of any Megapolis, they're part of the Megaregion idea which is a little different. But I agree with you about the I-35 corridor that is alot more realistic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 01:16 PM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,801,231 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by polo89 View Post
I see, but I-35 is the same way(minus the trees), alot of I-35's urbanization is visible.
I have no idea about I-35, but I believe you. I was just responding to the comments about I-85 between Atlanta and Charlotte because I'm very familiar with that stretch. I've visited Houston and Dallas, but never driven anywhere outside of the cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 01:32 PM
 
4,843 posts, read 6,099,045 times
Reputation: 4670
Quote:
Originally Posted by polo89 View Post
Yeah, to echo what Spade said, the map looks older. The I-35 corridor is ALOT more interconnected than what that map suggest. What about Beaumont and some of the other mid-sized cities sin East Texas? The Piedmont map seems to have EVERY city and town in-between.
Beaumont is east of Houston it’s not part the triangle, and the map was cut off from even showing it. But no it didn’t show every city on the piedmont If you notice Gadsden, and Anniston, Alabama wasn't even Circle and there small Metros of 100,000 between Atlanta and Birmingham. Also if the map is old for the triangle than it is probably old for the piedmont.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 01:56 PM
 
46 posts, read 59,383 times
Reputation: 40
Is this really very debatable? Economically the Texas Triangle is superior and that’s the only thing that really matters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 02:17 PM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,801,231 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by dumbd51 View Post
Is this really very debatable? Economically the Texas Triangle is superior and that’s the only thing that really matters.
Do you have a source to back up that statement? I'm sure both areas are very successful econmically, but I haven't ever found any information that supports your claim of superiority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
882 posts, read 2,244,744 times
Reputation: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeaconJ View Post
Do you have a source to back up that statement? I'm sure both areas are very successful econmically, but I haven't ever found any information that supports your claim of superiority.
Piedmont Atlantic-
Atlanta: 269,799
Charlotte: 118,350
Birmingham: 54,274
Relaigh: 53,464
Durham/Chapel Hill: 32,309
Greensboro: 33,175
Greenville,SC: 24,829
Winston-Salem: 21,936
Total GRP(Gross Regional Product): 608,136

Texas Triangle-
Houston: 403,202
DFW: 379,863
San Antonio: 80,896
Austin: 80,077
Killen/Temple: 14,552
Waco: 7,943
*couldnt find Bryan/CS numbers, so I'm guessing their economically irrelevant surprisingly.
Total GRP: 966,500

The Piedmont has less than 2/3, or 62.9% of the GAP of the Texas Triangle, so it depends on what your definition of superiority is. But it kind of is, considering the Piedmont has about 19 million residents, while the TX Triangle is closer to 17-17.5 million, so having a million+ less people yet having more than 1.5 times the GRP is being superior.

(2008 Figures from the BEA)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 08:58 PM
 
Location: Austin, Texas
3,092 posts, read 4,967,758 times
Reputation: 3186
I honestly think it all comes down to whether the triangle gets a high speed rail system. If they do then I think it's automatic. If not, it very well could be Piedmont.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top