Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Captain leaves cockpit. Co-pilot feels immediately ill, severe pain in his head. He begins descent. He can't speak. He reaches to unlock cabin door
. The pain was the onset of a brain aneurysm. He instead locks door. Ever witness some with a brain aneurysm? Ugly thing but they don't die immediately, they breathe on for a while. He sits in his seat, incapacitated. Plane eventually crashes.
Why do you continue to ignore the facts from the investigators?
So, my question is, can someone suffering from a brain aneurysm, or any other type of medical emergency, defeat the attempt to unlock the cabin door, and manually reduce the altitude level of the plane from the autopilot set of 30,000 plus ft to 100 ft?
It seems like a very cogent and deliberate set of actions to me.
So, my question is, can someone suffering from a brain aneurysm, or any other type of medical emergency, defeat the attempt to unlock the cabin door, and manually reduce the altitude level of the plane from the autopilot set of 30,000 plus ft to 100 ft?
It seems like a very cogent and deliberate set of actions to me.
That is the question isn't it. After learning that the autopilot had been set to 100 ft and not just a change of course I am firmly on the side of intentional act.
But I think that all possibilities should be looked at. There are situations where people in distress do things out of muscle memory or counter productive. eg: Paradoxical undressing when suffering from hypothermia.
Of course many people do not think this matter is serious enough to investigate any further and no amount of discussion will change that.
That is the question isn't it. After learning that the autopilot had been set to 100 ft and not just a change of course I am firmly on the side of intentional act.
But I think that all possibilities should be looked at. There are situations where people in distress do things out of muscle memory or counter productive. eg: Paradoxical undressing when suffering from hypothermia.
Of course many people do not think this matter is serious enough to investigate any further and no amount of discussion will change that.
What are you talking about, not serious enough? What do you think the investigators are doing? They're INVESTIGATING. You & someone else seem to be unable to look at the facts that the investigators so far have presented, the facts that CLEARLY show that this was a deliberate act. Anyway, the investigation is far from complete so your statement is completely baffling.
What are you talking about, not serious enough? What do you think the investigators are doing? They're INVESTIGATING. You & someone else seem to be unable to look at the facts that the investigators so far have presented, the facts that CLEARLY show that this was a deliberate act. Anyway, the investigation is far from complete so your statement is completely baffling.
So far, what facts say why he did it? Trying to kill himself isn't the only reason possible.
So far, what facts say why he did it? Trying to kill himself isn't the only reason possible.
Trying to kill himself & others, maybe he was on his depressant drugs maybe he wasn't. The fact is is that he deliberately crashed that plane, regardless of the reason why he did it. Trying to say that he had a stroke or a brain aneurysm is hilarious. Tell me, if this pilot were a musim, what would you be saying right now? I can guarantee what you'd be saying.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.