Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-29-2016, 07:24 AM
 
17,349 posts, read 11,305,123 times
Reputation: 41030

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
You beat me to it.

Democrat Trump did complain.

Trump called Electoral College a 'disaster' in 2012 tweet
And that's irrelevant also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-29-2016, 07:29 AM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,730,805 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
The thing you're not getting is that it doesn't matter if it's the 5th time or the 100th time. The national election system in this country is set up so States pick who the President will be, not the overall population by direct vote. It's designed to be that way since we are a nation of States or sovereign entities which united to become one country held together by a Constitution which gives limited but important powers to these states. We are not like Germany, Russia, Mexico or any other country in that regard.
If it eventually changes then fine, it will change. The prospects of it changing in any legal Constitutional fashion though is almost zero since smaller states far outnumber larger ones and they are not willingly going to bow down to 3-4 large states and be bullied by them.
Three or four large states that have populations that far outweigh those small states. At some point when they wanted something negotiations would be made. It would change. A state of 30 million is not going to meekly let a state of 750,000 tell them how to live their lives while taking all their tax dollars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2016, 07:30 AM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,426,253 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
This was only the fifth time it happened in our entire history. If it becomes a common result, it will get changed. No need to argue about it but it will get changed. Small rural states will not get to take all the tax dollars from large states while telling them how to live their lives. At some point the push back will be so intense a change is made or states are completely empowered and we look at Balkanizing the country.

Since when are Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Florida and North Carolina "small rural states"? You slay me with your ignorance. Small, rural states didn't elect Trump and neither did angry white men. The big cities elected Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2016, 07:36 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,279,369 times
Reputation: 19952
Quote:
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
And that's irrelevant also.
How so? It answered the question asked by the OP, rather than simply injecting an off topic opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2016, 07:37 AM
 
17,349 posts, read 11,305,123 times
Reputation: 41030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
Three or four large states that have populations that far outweigh those small states. At some point when they wanted something negotiations would be made. It would change. A state of 30 million is not going to meekly let a state of 750,000 tell them how to live their lives while taking all their tax dollars.
It's not about one state of 30,000,000 against one state of 750,000. It's about 3-4 states with largest populations against about 45 states with smaller populations.
Even smaller states like Vermont and New Hampshire which Hillary won, will probably not be willing to give up their rights as a State to a handful of larger States.
The Constitution doesn't change because a few states negotiate with each other. It doesn't work that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2016, 07:41 AM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,730,805 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Since when are Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Florida and North Carolina "small rural states"? You slay me with your ignorance. Small, rural states didn't elect Trump and neither did angry white men. The big cities elected Trump.
No they did not.

Ohio? Trump lost the big cities like Columbus, Toledo, Cincinnati and Cleveland.
Pennsylvania? Trump lost the big cities like Philadelphia and Pittsburg
Michigan? Trump lost Detroit, Flint and Ann Arbor
Wisconsin? Trump lost Milwaukee, Eau Claire and Madison
Florida? Trump lost Miami, Tampa, Palm Beach, Tallahassee and Orlando
North Carolina? Trump lost Charlotte, Fayetteville, Greensboro and Raleigh

Here's the New York Times election results for each state that includes the cities.

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2016, 07:45 AM
 
17,349 posts, read 11,305,123 times
Reputation: 41030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
No they did not.

Ohio? Trump lost the big cities like Columbus, Toledo, Cincinnati and Cleveland.
Pennsylvania? Trump lost the big cities like Philadelphia and Pittsburg
Michigan? Trump lost Detroit, Flint and Ann Arbor
Wisconsin? Trump lost Milwaukee, Eau Claire and Madison
Florida? Trump lost Miami, Tampa, Palm Beach, Tallahassee and Orlando
North Carolina? Trump lost Charlotte, Fayetteville, Greensboro and Raleigh

Here's the New York Times election results for each state that includes the cities.

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president
And that's irrelevant also. Voters are not given extra bonus points because they live in large cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2016, 08:22 AM
 
Location: NoVa
803 posts, read 1,669,282 times
Reputation: 873
If there's ever an election where the GOP candidate wins the PV but loses the EC, you can bet there will be some serious effort to change it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Since when are Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Florida and North Carolina "small rural states"? You slay me with your ignorance. Small, rural states didn't elect Trump and neither did angry white men. The big cities elected Trump.
Wrong. Roughly 800,000 people that flipped their states from blue to red (rust belt states plus Florida) put him over the 270 EV threshold.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2016, 08:22 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,664,682 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
No they did not.

Ohio? Trump lost the big cities like Columbus, Toledo, Cincinnati and Cleveland.
Pennsylvania? Trump lost the big cities like Philadelphia and Pittsburg
Michigan? Trump lost Detroit, Flint and Ann Arbor
Wisconsin? Trump lost Milwaukee, Eau Claire and Madison
Florida? Trump lost Miami, Tampa, Palm Beach, Tallahassee and Orlando
North Carolina? Trump lost Charlotte, Fayetteville, Greensboro and Raleigh

Here's the New York Times election results for each state that includes the cities.
He proved you wrong. Now you move the goal post to talk about the cities. OK, lets do.

I live in Charlotte. Trump did lose inner city Charlotte, and he won Metro Charlotte by wide margin.

Here's a tip. The NY Times = Fake News.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2016, 08:27 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,664,682 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASOT View Post
If there's ever an election where the GOP candidate wins the PV but loses the EC, you can bet there might be a serious push to change it.

  • There will never be a serious push to amend the US Constitution to eliminate the electoral college.
  • No real push to abolish the state elections for President
  • No real effort to create one large Federal election for President. i.e. the popular vote.

Doesn't matter how much the very small minority of voters whine about the results.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top