Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-19-2011, 11:26 AM
 
Location: The Midst of Insanity
3,219 posts, read 7,084,262 times
Reputation: 3286

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
Wow. Are you really equating having kids when you have no money - with breathing? Come on man.



Condoms are like 99% effective... again, not rocket science.
Condoms are like 71-85% effective.

Birth Control Considerations - Effectiveness of Contraception

Vasectomies and tubal libigations aren't even 100%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-19-2011, 11:33 AM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,863,777 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by annika08 View Post
Condoms are like 71-85% effective.

Birth Control Considerations - Effectiveness of Contraception

Vasectomies and tubal libigations aren't even 100%.
Better than nothing. Even at 71%, combined with another method with even just 80% accuracy and you have 94%+. And if used correctly, condoms have a much higher rate of effectiveness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 11:45 AM
 
12,906 posts, read 15,666,651 times
Reputation: 9394
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
Well I can only speak for myself but I've clarified my position on this. And anyone who says "don't have kids you can't afford" is obviously only referring to people who had those kids at a time when they couldn't afford them.

Okay. Now that we have that established and will note that this thread has turned away from "poor" people complaining to people being upset that people who can't afford children are getting assistance....

When you make that broad brush stroke that "well, you shouldn't complain since you were reckless or chose to have kids you couldn't afford" that a good number of people COULD afford kids when they had them. You would like to punish these people along with the deadbeats out there?

I, too, would like to see better control of the deadbeat breeders but in order to do that, you then punish those who really need help. There's no easy answer.

And to go back to the thread topic: do people REALLY feel that daycare costs are too high? I don't think those people get paid enough. But, yep, it does take a chunk of your income, for sure. I paid it on two kids until they were each about 13 years old.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 11:51 AM
LML
 
Location: Wisconsin
7,100 posts, read 9,114,142 times
Reputation: 5191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Factsplease View Post
And they wonder why all these anti-bullying policies have been put in place. This attitude that it's okay to pass judgement and look down on people (calling them stupid and lazy and thinking that they should be denied the same rights as everyone else) that aren't just like you has gotten out of control.

So far in this thread, poor people have been called stupid, lazy and it was said that they shouldn't have children because they breed more poor people. What a F-ed up way to look at the world and other human beings. Where is the compassion? Where is the understanding? You are so right, there is a large group of people who take pride in being inhumane and personally I would rather see a compassionate poor person have a child then one of these inhumane, selfish bullies.
These cruel horrors on this forum are the same people who bullied and destroyed the happiness of their fellow students in school. Nasty, small minded ignorant bullies who are so terrified by anything different that they must try to destroy it. How they look in the mirror or sleep at night is beyond me. But I do know that one day they will have to look into the face of the one who will say; "Whatsoever you did to the least of these you did to me." I would not want to be in their shoes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 11:55 AM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,863,777 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristineVA View Post
When you make that broad brush stroke that "well, you shouldn't complain since you were reckless or chose to have kids you couldn't afford" that a good number of people COULD afford kids when they had them. You would like to punish these people along with the deadbeats out there?
I wouldn't like to punish those people. I've been trying to find some stats on how many kids were born into poverty vs how many were not but are now in poverty due to the economy etc... I can't seem to find much.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristineVA View Post
I, too, would like to see better control of the deadbeat breeders but in order to do that, you then punish those who really need help. There's no easy answer.
Yeah, that's where it gets very difficult.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 11:57 AM
 
235 posts, read 510,855 times
Reputation: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristineVA View Post
And to go back to the thread topic: do people REALLY feel that daycare costs are too high? I don't think those people get paid enough. But, yep, it does take a chunk of your income, for sure. I paid it on two kids until they were each about 13 years old.
Yes, I think the cost of daycare is too high. I'll also add that I don't think daycare teachers are paid enough. My main issue is the greedy daycare COMPANIES. They pay the teachers crap wages yet charge parents a fortune...at least around here. For a daycare center here (Boston area) and infant/toddler costs over $1500 per month for full time care. Times that by 2 young children and that a HUGE amount of money every month. Like I said before, that's $30K per year for two kids.

If you're salary is average at even $50-60K (and of course that's before taxes, insurance, etc. being take out) it sure doesn't leave much extra. There are in-home options that cost less but from my experience the hours are less flexible, you're trusting someone alone w/ your kid vs. having multiple trained staff watching them, and the preschool aged kids suffer since there typically isn't a preschool program at in-home centers. I'll add that I am totally generalizing and I'm sure there are fantastic in-home centers that have a preschool program. I just didn't find any in my town. I also understand the Boston area is probably on the high-end for what daycare costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 12:55 PM
 
Location: St. Joseph Area
6,233 posts, read 9,484,309 times
Reputation: 3133
Quote:
Originally Posted by LML View Post
These cruel horrors on this forum are the same people who bullied and destroyed the happiness of their fellow students in school. Nasty, small minded ignorant bullies who are so terrified by anything different that they must try to destroy it. How they look in the mirror or sleep at night is beyond me. But I do know that one day they will have to look into the face of the one who will say; "Whatsoever you did to the least of these you did to me." I would not want to be in their shoes.
"If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered" --Proverbs 21:13
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Keller, TX
5,658 posts, read 6,279,394 times
Reputation: 4111
I'm not a bully. I've done the research and the empirical studies. I've seen the destruction. Kids are a luxury item. I'm happily child-free.

If parenthood sucks, why do we love it? Because we're addicted.
Happily Childfree
No Kidding!
Foolproof Birth Control -- Other People's Kids
No Kids Allowed


But let me tell you about what somebody said to me on my HOA forums last night. We were discussing adding a boatload of speedbumps to the neighborhood to discourage the behavior of people cutting through our streets to avoid lights. Anyway, I said I would support "speed mounds" or "speed hills" OR speed BUMPS if they have indents to allow two-wheeled vehicles to safely pass (I won't go into the hilarity that ensued the day I tried to cross over rather than around the giant bumps in the parking complex at work on my bike). I commute 90-95% of the days on a motorcycle (65-70 MPG).

Guy told me "you don't have kids so we're not interested in your opinion" and another guy seconded the motion that my opinion wasn't worth spit because I'm child-free.

There's constant bigotry against child-free singles and couples at work as well. Somebody who's child-free is a second-class citizen when it comes to illness days, vacation picks, weekends/evenings required, etc. (I get a triple-whammy of bigotry because I'm also an atheist and a libertarian, but I digress). Bullies?

Maybe this post is off-topic, and maybe I'll create a new thread to further it. It just seems a little telling to me that the idea of not having children is met by disdain and name-calling. Should everyone be child-free? No, it's not for everyone, but it should be for a lot more people than it is. Much like Christianity (where people feign it because it's just the thing to do and they don't really know how to think outside of rigid societal guidelines), procreating seems to be something some people do just for the hell of it. Why is my sister's childhood friend pregnant with her sixth kid now when the third, fourth, and fifth are already overburdening the family as far as time and money? Why are people having children when by and large they're miserable about it?

Last edited by Nepenthe; 08-19-2011 at 02:19 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 01:19 PM
 
2,125 posts, read 1,940,747 times
Reputation: 1010
Let's pretend for a second that not all of the poor people who have children are lazy, idle pieces of human garbage, like most of the right-wingers on this board choose to believe. Let's pretend that they are simply poor, hard-working people who made a mistake, since, you know, growing up impoverished doesn't really help prepare you to make great life choices at every turn, even if you are a savvy and careful individual.

Is it in the best interest of our society to give those people the opportunity to raise their children in a decent environment by providing affordable childcare, recognizing that though many of these people are simply not up to the task of being parents, many are struggling as hard as they can to provide for their kids?

Or is it in the best interest of our society to consider their plight as punishment for their foolish decision, refuse to encourage programs or initiatives which might aid them (because that might mean taking money from rich people), creating an intractable underclass which will only continue to grow?

Having a child in a poor position is punishment enough, and even a mother who loves and cares for her child while working multiple jobs will struggle to get by if she is solo. Why do people with wealth take glee in stripping her chances to improve her family's lot in life?

Costs for healthcare, education, and other necessities have skyrocketed, and that holds even if you take inflation into account. For all the pseudo-meritocratic implications of the words of the right, they are dead-set on eliminating the societal aids to social mobility that existed in years before. . For all their hatred of the poor, it seems like all they want to do is produce more of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 01:25 PM
 
3,436 posts, read 2,950,469 times
Reputation: 1787
Quote:
Originally Posted by mackinac81 View Post
"If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered" --Proverbs 21:13
There is a lot more where that came from. The sad part is that some of these people go to church every Sunday and claim to be people of faith but are incapable of showing the least bit of compassion or understanding to anyone unlike themselves.

"If there is a poor man among your brothers in any of the towns of the land that the LORD your God is giving you, do not be hardhearted or tightfisted toward your poor brother. There will always be poor people in the land. Therefore I command you to be openhanded toward your brothers and toward the poor and needy in your land."
-Deuteronomy 15:7, 11

"Do not take advantage of a hired man who is poor and needy, whether he is a brother Israelite or an alien living in one of your towns."
-Deuteronomy 24:14

"Blessed is he who has regard for the weak; the LORD delivers him in times of trouble. The LORD will protect him and preserve his life; he will bless him in the land and not surrender him to the desire of his foes."
-Psalm 41:1-2

"He who oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God."
-Proverbs 14:31

"Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy."
-Proverbs 31:8-9


"Learn to do right! Seek justice, encourage the oppressed. Defend the cause of the fatherless, plead the case of the widow."
-Isaiah 1:17


Okay, I got carried away but God doesn't like ugly and there are sooo many people behaving that way and glorifying it these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top