Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Last I heard, the states are states. The government making a recommendation is not the same as making a law.
Sure it is. When the federal govt threatens to withhold funds to the state for not complying with their "recommendation" it has the same impact as a law.
How do you think they got the states to lower the speed limit to 55?
Sure it is. When the federal govt threatens to withhold funds to the state for not complying with their "recommendation" it has the same impact as a law.
How do you think they got the states to lower the speed limit to 55?
Same with seat belt laws. We lose fed funds because we dont have a seat belt law.
Let's see. The Nanny state says its okay to have amplifiers and speakers on your car radio that make the brain of a driver, and anyone alongside them, quiver like a bowl of jello but it's wrong to use a hand's-off cell phone device.
It's a law a day late and a dollar short since many businesses are centered around access to the mobile telephones. It's just another job-killing piece of legislation this Administration has grown famous for.
Most states already have laws on the books for this. They are Reckless Driving and Driving Without Giving Full Attention or some variation.
More laws are NOT needed.
I suppose they just need to classify cell phone usage as "inattentive driving" and start writing tickets for it. I think that's what the recommendation is all about anyway.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.