Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why all the fuss over sexual gratification for no reproductive purpose? Why condemn any act, with whomever, whatever, however, that is consensual? Why condemn those who use animals and other wildlife? Why not promulgate this widely, in public, so children can learn to mimic this behavior? Why not lower the age of consent to 12, or 9, or 7?
Obviously, any limitations on the behavior of “Free people†seeking sexual gratification must be a sign of mental aberration.
And anyone who dares object, and does not wish to be served by or associate with such “Free people†should be compelled to endure them, or better yet, pay taxes to support them, even when they suffer consequences from that behavior.
That’s fair, right?
Why all the fuss over sexual gratification for no reproductive purpose?
Perhaps because sexual gratification does not require 'reproductive purpose' to be legitimate? If it required reproductive purpose, then why (amongst many other things) doesn't the State perform mandatory fertility testing on to-be-married couples? Or force them to declare intent to conceive/bear children?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics
Why condemn any act, with whomever, whatever, however, that is consensual?
Why indeed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics
Why condemn those who use animals and other wildlife?
Because it's not consensual.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics
Why not promulgate this widely, in public, so children can learn to mimic this behavior?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics
Why not lower the age of consent to 12, or 9, or 7?
Because children are not adults and we don't expect them as a matter of law to make adult/legally binding decisions?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics
Obviously, any limitations on the behavior of “Free people” seeking sexual gratification must be a sign of mental aberration.
And anyone who dares object, and does not wish to be served by or associate with such “Free people” should be compelled to endure them, or better yet, pay taxes to support them, even when they suffer consequences from that behavior.
What consequences are those, exactly? Please do be specific.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics
That’s fair, right?
Depends on your definition of "fair", now doesn't it?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
