Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Let us know when you know the difference in a 13 year old and a new born
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet
As far as adoption goes there is a big difference.Vast majority of new borns put for adoption are adopted .either through private agencies or foster care. if a child who is 13 enters foster care you have a very different situation as far as being adopted,The best chance for a 13 year old going to foster care is to be adopted by a relative usually grandparents or Aunts and uncles.So as far as adoption goes there is a large gap.I have not seen a new born put into foster care who ends up a 13 year old drug addict who never got adopted
I know you work for an adoption agency that only works with newborns, and your agenda and bias are showing ($$$$), but how can you possibly refer to yourself as pro-life when you say the life of a newborn has more value than that of a teen in foster care? That's sick, distorted, bizarre sanctity of life logic for you.
Planned Parenthood was founded to provide abortions to mostly black and brown women. The other offered services, distract the public from focussing on their primary purpose.
What has that got to do with Planned Parenthood in 2012?
Why would I want to cut funding to PP.....they provide much needed services for women.....and men.
What vital services? STD checks can be done cheaper at a hospital usually. Whatever they do can be done by someone else.
Quote:
I can't pick and choose what my tax dollars pay for.....what makes you so special?
It's our business where our taxpayer money goes. Especially in this recession and debt ceiling, one of the first things we can feel good about cutting is funding towards PP. And yes, we do have a choice. If enough citizens knew that PP was getting federal funding and using it to launder towards abortion services, it'd almost definitely end very soon.
That your "logic" can be applied to all social services.
What vital services? STD checks can be done cheaper at a hospital usually. Whatever they do can be done by someone else.
Done cheaper in a hospital? Prove it.
It's our business where our taxpayer money goes. Especially in this recession and debt ceiling, one of the first things we can feel good about cutting is funding towards PP. And yes, we do have a choice. If enough citizens knew that PP was getting federal funding and using it to launder towards abortion services, it'd almost definitely end very soon.
Ummm, yeah, what we need in a recession is more unwanted children being born to parents who can't afford to care for them.....more welfare, more WIC, more food stamps, more free healthcare handed out.....yep, that's gonna help the bottom line.
Oh wait...what's to worry....we can just raise taxes.....that'll work.
Ummm, yeah, what we need in a recession is more unwanted children being born to parents who can't afford to care for them.....more welfare, more WIC, more food stamps, more free healthcare handed out.....yep, that's gonna help the bottom line.
Oh wait...what's to worry....we can just raise taxes.....that'll work.
I have my personal experience to go off on. I did once go to a PP for a STD check and it cost me ~50$, I went several other times to clinics and the most I paid at those were ~15, in fact I remember not paying at all. PP is just a front for abortion, they offer other services so they can launder money towards abortion.
I rather have my tax money go towards welfare feeding innocent kids than killing them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.