Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I can cite numerous studies which back up my statement that promiscuity is rampant amongst many gay men. Stating certain facts, does not make me a bigot, I'm just bringing this to light.
And I'm willing to bet you that if you remove the word "gay" from the study, the numbers won't change at all. Because, you know, men like sex...
She said that homosexuality is a learned behavior.
He doesn't want to address my point, because it's hard to refute that many men enter prison as heterosexuals, but upon their release, a great number of them continue to engage in sex with men.
The interesting point about this particular population of males is, many of them wouldn't have ever engaged in sex with men, if they weren't exposed to same sex relations on a wide scale level in prison. One can therefore argue that many of these males were socialized to accept and engage in homosexual activities.
I would think that if homosexuality was truly innate, the above example wouldn't occur.
He doesn't want to address my point, because it's hard to refute that many men enter prison as heterosexuals, but upon their release, a great number of them continue to engage in sex with men.
The interesting point about this particular population of males is, many of them wouldn't have ever engaged in sex with men, if they weren't exposed to same sex relations on a wide scale level in prison. One can therefore argue that many of these males were socialized to accept and engage in homosexual activities.
I would think that if homosexuality was truly innate, the above example wouldn't occur.
What difference does it make whether it's innate or not? Or whether it's "learned" or a "choice?" What implication would that have for marriage? I would argue it would have no implication whatsoever.
I'm failing to see the point in any of your comments.
Being gay is about attraction, not the act itself. That's where Mary missed the point.
So you're arguing that a person can engage in homosexuality, but if they lack attraction to the person that they are engaged in the sexuality activity with, they are not gay?
Marriage is between a man and a woman,
I don't care what government humans create
in THEIR own image, approving of same-sex "marriage",
it will NEVER BE marriage.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.