Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: planet octupulous is nearing earths atmosphere
13,621 posts, read 12,731,507 times
Reputation: 20050
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch
I agree, but if trend continues as they have for the last 130 years, this current cooling trend will only last 30 to 35 years, until around 2040 to 2045. Then it will warm up again for a similar period.
well my crystal ball says at least 200 plus years of a serious cooling trend and that will create massive ice cap regeneration, which intern will create more and more albedo effect, and then onto a full blow ice age. and then on to the start of a snow ball earth.. and then the volcano's will spew forth billions of tons of co2 and melt all the ice and everything will be good to go!!!
but please don't tell that to the warmers, it's a secret
well my crystal ball says at least 200 plus years of a serious cooling trend and that will create massive ice cap regeneration, which intern will create more and more albedo effect, and then onto a full blow ice age. and then on to the start of a snow ball earth.. and then the volcano's will spew forth billions of tons of co2 and melt all the ice and everything will be good to go!!!
but please don't tell that to the warmers, it's a secret
We are already in "a full blow[n] ice age" and have been for the last 2.588 million years. The last time the planet was a "snow ball" was Precambrian, more than half a billion years ago.
The other words in "in other words" are words you made up.
For the home audience and those just joining us, what I'm talking about stems from this post in another, very similar, thread. I got back to Mr. 310 with the following:
I stand by everything I've said.
And yet volcanos and not man has caused climactic changes.
I am just gonna go out on a limb and say that you are lying..... You realize how easy it is to search your posting history and see what preconceived notions you bring to the table.
Or look in a mirror and swear on everything you love and hold dear what you said is not a lie.
Again.... I'm going out on a limb here and calling you out. I don't think YOU can explain the difference between a scientific theory and law. LOLZ.... I mean it was your claim in the beginning and you can't even defend yourself.....
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLZ
You can't even muster a link to support your statements and can only reply "deal with it." How impotent.
Don't need a link. Volcano in Iceland plunged the world into a massive cooling period during the 1700's. Famine, etc. Remember that? Krakatoa anyone?.
Like I said, the changes in the sea level have absolutely nothing to do with the amount of ice on the planet. There was no ice at either pole during the Jurassic or Cretaceous periods. The ice-age cycles did not appear until around 40 million years ago when the Indian continent slammed into the Eurasian continent and formed the Himalayan mountain range and the Tibetan plateau.
When these ice-ages began the amount of ice that formed on land would reduce the sea levels some, but not much. The idea that the weight of the ice could press down on the Earth's crust is pure fantasy bordering on lunacy.
Well I think the weight of ice 2 miles high might press down land enough to create a small lake like ossipee lake, which is said to be rebounding. This little lake i think is about 30 feet deep. To me it's a big mud hole and i don't like it there much.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.