Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If we're going to use hearings as a method to bring down political opponents, where are the hearings on the Iraq debacle? How many died in Iraq? How much honesty was there in the justification? Why did billions of dollars on pallets disappear in Bagdad? Why? Four Americans died in Benghazi while 4,491 Americans died in Iraq.
I see no one has touched this with a ten foot pole.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer
The problem is obama, rice and HRC lied to everyone, telling them benghazi was caused by a video to protect obama's claim of defeating terrorists just before election.
Legal or not this entire episode was an unethical scam that was going to pass without consequence for the lying administration. The fact that an attack on the anniversary of 911 was a surprise to the state dept and obama points to colossal failure on their part.
Too bad the media propaganda machine became obama's lap dog, it would have eliminated the need for the benghazi hearings by challenging the lies of the obama administration.
So telling everyone it was about a video is MUCH MORE important than the 4500 Bush killed in Iraq.
If we're going to use hearings as a method to bring down political opponents, where are the hearings on the Iraq debacle? How many died in Iraq? How much honesty was there in the justification? Why did billions of dollars on pallets disappear in Bagdad? Why? Four Americans died in Benghazi while 4,491 Americans died in Iraq.
In the mind of a liberal, no democrat scandal is valid- not one
1. Benghazi
2. Fast and Furious
3. IRS scandal
4. NSA scandal
5. targeting opposition journalists
6. Rezko
7. Al Sharpton and Charlie Rangle tax dodges
8. Nancy Pelosi and Barb Boxer shunting contracts to relatives
9. Whitewater
10. Vince Foster
11. Bill Clinton's multiple rapes
12. Hillary e mail scandal
13. Chapaquitic
14. Dodd and Frank Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac scandal
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn
All of these witch hunts were a total waste of time and tax payer money.
Nope, they are not all witch hunts. Some are completely legit scandals, yet this administration is great at stonewalling and placing blame elsewhere. Come on, even the media has complained about that.
In the mind of a liberal, no democrat scandal is valid- not one
1. Benghazi
2. Fast and Furious
3. IRS scandal
4. NSA scandal
5. targeting opposition journalists
6. Rezko
7. Al Sharpton and Charlie Rangle tax dodges
8. Nancy Pelosi and Barb Boxer shunting contracts to relatives
9. Whitewater
10. Vince Foster
11. Bill Clinton's multiple rapes
12. Hillary e mail scandal
13. Chapaquitic
14. Dodd and Frank Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac scandal
As liberals are totalitarian in nature, they can never accept that the rule of law applies to all citizens and that elitists are not above the law.
How about the scandal of the Republicans using the House to run bogus "investigations" on their political opponents for the sole purpose of smearing them politically? You were all up in arms when you thought the IRS was targeting right wing organizations, but you don't seem to have a problem with Republicans mis-using their majority in the House to target Democrats.
This man has no business being speaker of the house and third in line to be president. He doesn't sound qualified to me. If you are going to get a different speaker of the house, at least improve the position with the next speaker. I disagreed with every other sentence I heard him say plus he was elected by a district that is 35% Hispanic and we all know what that means. Haven't the Republicans learned anything? I fear not. I am about to change my registration to unaffiliated. I am disgusted with both parties. Maybe it is time for a Tea Party that is serious about being American.
I believe you missed the point, and are making things up to fit your wishes, he said and meant no such thing.
Yeah, they need NINE investigations only because the first EIGHT didn't yield anything. Give me a break. These are ongoing for one reason and one reason only, and Kevin McCarthy inadvertently told us exactly what that reason is. Not that most of us with two brain cells to rub together didn't already know it. Not everyone is as ignorant of the obvious as the right would wish.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
