Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I already told you. I used to live there. I know the families. They have copies of the reports filed. That's how it works. You file a complaint; you get a copy.
So now it goes from a news article that says someone said that they heard that this supposedly happened to you know the family to you have actual copied of the students school records that are not released to anyone but the students family. Unless you are the trans students family you would have no access to that students records. But you are claiming to be a friend of the other students family so how would you have the trans students records?
BUT since YOU have those records, it would be no problem blacking out the personal information and posting those records to prove your claim.
PS, you can not file a complaint and get other peoples childrens school records.
So now it goes from a news article that says someone said that they heard that this supposedly happened to you know the family to you have actual copied of the students school records that are not released to anyone but the students family. Unless you are the trans students family you would have no access to that students records. But you are claiming to be a friend of the other students family so how would you have the trans students records?
BUT since YOU have those records, it would be no problem blacking out the personal information and posting those records to prove your claim.
PS, you can not file a complaint and get other peoples childrens school records.
I know the families involved. I've heard what they've had to say about it and read their copies of the reports filed.
PLUS the USDoE OCR report cites multiple instances of the "trans" but still male breaking the rules by being present in the girls' facilities when that was prohibited.
And not one mention of the student exposing their genitalia to anyone.
Why would the USDoE include that in their report if their intent all along was to force indecent exposure sexual abuse onto MINOR school children?
This is what's known as DISCOVERY in courts of law: Each side presents their version of events. The sad part in this case is that it wasn't a fair fight. The USDoE threatened the withholding of millions of dollars in Title I, etc., federal funding if the IL school district didn't kowtow to the USDoE's version of events. Meanwhile, the IL school district has nothing of comparable value that they can withhold from the federal government.
Why would the USDoE include that in their report if their intent all along was to force indecent exposure sexual abuse onto MINOR school children?
This is what's known as DISCOVERY in courts of law: Each side presents their version of events. The sad part in this case is that it wasn't a fair fight. The USDoE threatened the withholding of millions of dollars in Title I, etc., federal funding if the IL school district didn't kowtow to the USDoE's version of events. Meanwhile, the IL school district has nothing of comparable value that they can withhold from the federal government.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Stop lying because no one is falling for it. 
