Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
One of the reasons for giving the BGC automatically after three days was to keep a POTUS from using an executive order and cutting off funding for the BCG checks. Or they could do that and eliminate all new permits.
If a background check for purchasing a gun is stupid, do you think a background check, and fingerprinting, is stupid to work in public schools or with the disabled population?
If a background check for purchasing a gun is stupid, do you think a background check, and fingerprinting, is stupid to work in public schools or with the disabled population?
They are very different situations, aren't they? In one case we are afraid they may murder someone, in another case, we are afraid they may not fit the job.
I don't know Katrina was over 11 years ago, I don't remember what came about from this. Of course we have officers illegally murdering unarmed people and not being arrested, so maybe the accountability of our officers is something we should work on.
Note in the 2006 interview, it was a different superintendent and he admitted that he's going to do the same thing again.
The fact this actually happened shows us how dangerous the government can be. Had it not been for NRA, those people would not even get their properties back, nor would many states put in specific laws preventing this from happening.
The NRA did not get their guns back.. No one that had their arms confiscated, got them back. They never made it to any official place to store.. Those that confiscated them, kept them. With no recorded record of who took what, from who.
Could anybody help me to understand why people don't realize this? If we do a survey, over 90% of Americans would support background check.
"Gee, I can't buy a gun so I must do no killing!" Said by no one in the history of mankind!
If a person is so dangerous that we don't trust them with a firearm, why do we even let that person walk outside of prison or hospital?
Instead, we spend billions on background check while the bad guys are happily running around, raping and murdering people with and without guns.
US Military background aren't even thoroughly done.... LOL background checks will mostly likely help but wont stop guns from getting in the wrong hands
let use CHICAGO (CHIRAQ) as perfect example bans on guns but they get them in
US Military background aren't even thoroughly done.... LOL background checks will mostly likely help but wont stop guns from getting in the wrong hands
let use CHICAGO (CHIRAQ) as perfect example bans on guns but they get them in
How does it help to stop anything?
"Gee, I can't buy a gun so I must do no killing!" Said no one in the history of mankind!
They are very different situations, aren't they? In one case we are afraid they may murder someone, in another case, we are afraid they may not fit the job.
Or maybe a convicted child molester might molest a child in school? I suppose you could say not fit for their job.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
