Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Charity usually helps out once a month and only for a certain amount of times per year. The need is greater than the supply so that’s not quite an answer either
Charity worked well during Great Depression.
Family and friends can assist also. Surely, they must know someone who actually w-o-r-k-s!
Family and friends can assist also. Surely, they must know someone who actually w-o-r-k-s!
You can’t compare times back then and needs back then to right now. My parents have work in the social services industry for 35 years now and I’ve seen that there are limitations and just how much private charity can help out. If we get rid of things like food stamps soon they’ll be calling for taking back government subsidies as well for these charities.
You can’t compare times back then and needs back then to right now. My parents have work in the social services industry for 35 years now and I’ve seen that there are limitations and just how much private charity can help out. If we get rid of things like food stamps soon they’ll be calling for taking back government subsidies as well for these charities.
Not get rid of, require work to be 10x the handout. Similar to unemployment comp-and those people collecting it worked.
Great job market. However, a large portion of the USA has a lousy work ethic.
Not get rid of, require work to be 10x the handout. Similar to unemployment comp-and those people collecting it worked.
Great job market. However, a large portion of the USA has a lousy work ethic.
You’re missing my point. Daycare is expensive and often takes up more than someone is earning or one parents whole paycheck. Not everyone has the luxury of having family or friends he can watch a child for free. People should not be penalized because it’s better financially for them to stay home then go to work
You’re missing my point. Daycare is expensive and often takes up more than someone is earning or one parents whole paycheck. Not everyone has the luxury of having family or friends he can watch a child for free. People should not be penalized because it’s better financially for them to stay home then go to work
Working people should not subsidize Welfare Mamas choices.
10x would be a fair requirement.
Welfare Mama can stay home even under a 10x rule. Just not under the wallet of those working.
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,619,501 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960
Working people should not subsidize Welfare Mamas choices.
10x would be a fair requirement.
Welfare Mama can stay home even under a 10x rule. Just not under the wallet of those working.
No it wouldn't
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
