Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, not that highly leveraged. This guy has multiple LARGE income streams with several recent multi-million dollar windfalls. There's no way he can spend money fast enough to not have $130K in liquidity. And even if he could be that highly leveraged, why would he? I don't believe it. There's something going on here. Mark my words.
Exactly! Why would someone mortgage their house for someone else? It's not like Trump can't afford it.
You guys are unbelievable. It's not LITERALLY knocking in doors, but you know: a FBI raid at 3AM in 3 different locations is figuratively knocking in doors.
The point is that it's HIGHLY unusual for this a raid on a lawyer to be approved. So either they found a willing judge (and don't give me the judges are impartial crap), or there is a major underlying crime. Violating election rules shouldn't be a high enough bar to justify a raid like this.
It wasn't. This is about money laundering while Cohen was fundraising for the RNC and in Miami, his ties to Cambridge Analytica and Gazprom, payoffs to any other Trump sexual assault accusers, conspiring to obstruct justice, and probably a laundry list of specifics beyond that of lesser import.
You guys are overthinking this. 90% of America doesn't care about Mueller and are not paying attention.
Rosenstein's days are number, I think that's a given. He'll probably keep Sessions in power though.
I don't "care" enough to have been posting on this thread or others like the Stormy Daniels one (this was quick pop-in) and certainly haven't been paying attention for I'm sick to death of hearing about Trump.
I get enough of him on matters related to other national issues.
From Trump's actions, it doesn't at all surprise me there's something to hide that's probably financial. Mueller will either find it or he will not. It will either be impeachable or it will not. Time will tell.
So you can put me in the 90 percent. However, if he tried to fire Mueller that in and off itself would become "proof" enough to stir.
I think you'll find that 90 percent figure falling thru the floor real fast.
Thinking more ... the difference is that like him or not he's still the legitimate President.
Firing Mueller would have the effect of him delegitimizing himself ... of crossing or skirting a Constitutional line.
It wasn't. This is about money laundering while Cohen was fundraising for the RNC and in Miami, his ties to Cambridge Analytica and Gazprom, payoffs to any other Trump sexual assault accusers, conspiring to obstruct justice, and probably a laundry list of specifics beyond that of lesser import.
"conspiring to obstruct justice"? Any idea of the details? This is different from firing Comey,right?
It wasn't. This is about money laundering while Cohen was fundraising for the RNC and in Miami, his ties to Cambridge Analytica and Gazprom, payoffs to any other Trump sexual assault accusers, conspiring to obstruct justice, and probably a laundry list of specifics beyond that of lesser import.
Bingo. We also know that Cohen when to Prague in Aug 2016 and met with Russian agents. The Daniels payoff may have been enough for a judge to sign the warrant -- but the FBI may have really hit paydirt with documents and evidence for the many things you listed as well as the Russian liaison meeting.
Also, I do not think it is a coincidence that Ryan announced his retirement shortly after the Cohen raid -- they both have RNC ties. Repubs know Mueller's got the goods and will deliver major indictments: that's why Nunes shut the House investigation down early, it's why Trey Gowdy quit, it's why dozens of Repubs are not running for reelection. A storm is a comin.'
that's the first time i've heard of the lawyer in a lawsuit pleading the 5th.
from the link:
“I find this incredibly ironic because Donald Trump has been very outspoken in the past about people that plead the Fifth,” Avenatti noted."
yes he has:
"If you are not guilty of a crime, what do you need immunity for ? The mob takes the Fifth Amendment. If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?"
- Donald J Trump
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
