Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
First republicans fought to give billionaire Donald Trump $15 million dollars a year in tax cuts, then republican support Trump keeping the $5 million a year he gets from housing aid subsidies, and then republicans come out fighting to cut welfare for needy Americans. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...vings-analysis
Its not just that republicans help and protect rich men more than they help and protect low income women and children. Republicans help and protect rich men more than themselves (to the point they are willing to take cuts to their own Social Security and Medicare to give rich men tax cuts.)
What about people who had children when things were going well for them, and then, for whatever reason, they lost a good job and had to take a poor one, or became disabled in some way, to the point that they can't work?
In any case, even if the parents are idiots, does that mean that their children should suffer?
Is there no room in your ideology for the fact that sometimes bad things happen to good people?
That’s why you save instead of living paycheck to paycheck. Simple concept.
One or two too many. Can’t afford them, don’t breed. Simple concept.
No, your assessment is too simple, due to the fact that your worldview is too narrow...
People generally experience unforeseen circumstances. There are such things as job loss, divorce, illness, injury, death, medical expenses, etc...
Some people who were once middle-class, only a few years later find themselves in need of food stamps. Widows who are also mothers of multiple children suddenly and quite unexpectedly find themselves unable to financially support their children.
There are many scenarios that can negatively impact the financial stability of American families.
You don't snatch the safety net from American children under any circumstances. That's whether their mothers have used poor judgement or not.
That's why we need to cover sex education and family planning in high school. In many secondary educational curricula, sex is never discussed in any beneficial manner.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
