Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-10-2018, 09:32 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,528,817 times
Reputation: 10096

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nanny Goat View Post
I don't get how their can be branded "conservative" or "liberal" judges, which there are. Some do lean this way or that, but I guess I'm naive. Aren't judges supposed to interpret the law based on non biased decision making--nothing to do w/ their own politics or religion or own social issue preference? Supreme Court--if it leans either way-- what real justice is there?
"Conservative" judges are just what you described, committed to interpret the law and not allowing their personal biases on what they would like the law to be to interfere with their judgments.

"Leftist" judges are committed to advocating for the political platforms and preferences preferred by the "Politically correct" left. In fact, they regard the US Constitution as an anachronism that needs to be overruled and re-imagined by "wise latinas" and the like.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-10-2018, 09:35 AM
 
11,523 posts, read 14,665,551 times
Reputation: 16821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
"Conservative" judges are just what you described, committed to interpret the law and not allowing their personal biases on what they would like the law to be to interfere with their judgments.

"Leftist" judges are committed to advocating for the political platforms and preferences preferred by the "Politically correct" left. In fact, they regard the US Constitution as an anachronism that needs to be overruled and re-imagined by "wise latinas" and the like.
No, it's not that way. Each "side" interprets law and brings down rulings based on their own political background and leanings. Look at what's there now and how they "decide" things. They all lean one way or other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 09:36 AM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,337,216 times
Reputation: 8066
Just swinging by to see what's what. Trump settled on the safe, boring pick and libs are hysterical anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 09:36 AM
 
11,404 posts, read 4,091,368 times
Reputation: 7852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nanny Goat View Post

The ones on Trump's list were all deemed conservatives.
True, but Kavanaugh was actually not as conservative as two other final four judges. He's more of a moderate like Kennedy.

Though many conservative talking heads and City-Data Trump supporters are publicly applauding Trump's pick, secretly they were probably like "huh?" Kavanaugh has been referred to as a "Bush guy" and a "typical establishment republican," which is not what Trump and his supporters are about.

Kavanaugh will probably not go after abortion and gay marriage, which many (but not all) Trump voters probably are not happy about.

But then we keep coming back to the WHY. Why did Trump appoint a judge closer to center when there were two other judges of the final four that were much more conservative? Because kavanaugh wants to protect Trump from Mueller. Trump picked Kavanaugh because its in his own best interest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,668,310 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Earlier this year, he dissented from a decision upholding the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, created during the Obama administration to enforce regulations against banks, lenders and other business groups. He called independent agencies such as the CFPB "a headless fourth branch of the U.S. government."
Clearly he prefers the government take over such regulation, as opposed to using independent agencies. Kind of the opposite of what a conservative would want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 09:40 AM
 
11,404 posts, read 4,091,368 times
Reputation: 7852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
Just swinging by to see what's what. Trump settled on the safe, boring pick and libs are hysterical anyway.
Correct. Considering the final four, liberals should be fairly happy. Kavanaugh is more conservative than kennedy, but not nearly as conservative as some of the other finalists. So both liberals and some way-to-the-right conservatives are a little upset this morning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 09:40 AM
 
11,046 posts, read 5,277,048 times
Reputation: 5253
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
It's sad that Trump gets credit from his supporters, thinking he chose Kavanaugh to further the conservative agenda. Trump picked Kavanaugh for Trump, period. That piece Kavanaugh wrote back in 2009 about the President being untouchable by the justice system is why Trump picked him.

Kavanaugh wrote that POTUS should have “absolute discretion” to determine whether and when to appoint or fire a special counsel.

And that a president should not be criminally indicted, no matter what evidence of wrongdoing is uncovered."


The way Kavanaugh sees it, not only should Trump be granted the power as POTUS to fire a Special Counsel (like Robert Mueller) himself, but Trump, the sitting president, cannot be criminally indicted, "no matter what evidence of wrongdoing is uncovered."

That is an absolute wet dream for Donald Trump.





silly and lame from democrats......this is from the same libs that said Bubba Clinton shouldn't have been
impeached and Hillary didn't do anything illegal and defended her and voted for her to be President.




and the liberal hysteria continues.............
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 09:43 AM
 
10,513 posts, read 5,171,947 times
Reputation: 14056
Kavanaugh is a flip-flop judge. Worked on the Clinton impeachment and it was all okay with him then.
Now he says presidents should be largely immune from indictments, subpoenas and lawsuits.
Which is it?


Key question during confirmation hearings: "Mr. Kavanaugh, do you believe the president is above the law or not?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 09:43 AM
 
17,347 posts, read 11,297,907 times
Reputation: 41015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
Just swinging by to see what's what. Trump settled on the safe, boring pick and libs are hysterical anyway.
Pretty much. It was a smart choice by Trump, not giving the left much fuel while keeping the Court right of center just before the midterm elections thus making as few waves as possible. The left now are focusing on how this pick is going to save Trump from going to jail, LOL. I guess that's all they have to talk about now since they keep repeating it over and over again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 09:45 AM
 
17,347 posts, read 11,297,907 times
Reputation: 41015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
Kavanaugh is a flip-flop judge. Worked on the Clinton impeachment and it was all okay with him then.
Now he says presidents should be largely immune from indictments, subpoenas and lawsuits.
Which is it?


Key question during confirmation hearings: "Mr. Kavanaugh, do you believe the president is above the law or not?"
You obviously don't get it. Impeachment and being prosecuted in lawsuits are two very different things but don't let little things like facts get in the way of your talking points.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top