Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-16-2019, 06:43 AM
Status: "Moldy Tater Gangrene, even before Moscow Marge." (set 4 days ago)
 
Location: Dallas, TX
5,790 posts, read 3,602,372 times
Reputation: 5697
Quote:
Originally Posted by mash123 View Post
So basically you say that there are demographics that you can offend and there are others that you can not. Am I right?
Sometimes, especially if you're in a clearly higher prestige/power group than the other group. Why else would rural to small city blue collar types get offended at a "coastal elitist" comedian having jokes about "rednecks"?


Beyond this, you seem to be assuming that:

1. Gillette and its ad agency attacked masculinity in general.

2. Traditional definitions and criteria for masculinity don't need to change.

3. It should be socially acceptable to disparage or condescend to women and "unmanly men".

4. Any male (especially in the average or lower half of the dominance hierarchy) who object to or trivializes bullying, condescension to women (or even uncalled for sexual gestures), and disparagement of "unmanly males" is themselves worthy of whatever disparagement that comes their way.

If I am misreading you, how am I doing so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-16-2019, 06:46 AM
 
Location: Camberville
15,866 posts, read 21,452,288 times
Reputation: 28216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian658 View Post
To teach a boy or a girl to act wimpy leads to the snowflakery we have in this era. Men are supposed to be the stronger sex. This is due to evolution and sexual dimorphism.
If men are the "stronger sex," why are so many men so upset about this ad?

Being strong means being confident. Are you confident in your masculinity? If this commercial makes you so uncomfortable that you're complaining about it or even changing your shopping habits, the answer is no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 06:54 AM
 
Location: Boston, MA
14,483 posts, read 11,287,685 times
Reputation: 9002
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile View Post
If one feels the need to insult & denigrate other men, they have low self esteem, no self confidence. What exactly is the problem with these other men?
This public service ad from Gillette is one big insult and denigration of other men, yet you have no problem with that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 06:58 AM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,447 posts, read 4,755,015 times
Reputation: 15354
I find it amusing that SJWs seem to have decided that the best way to bully men in to supporting this ad or keeping silent about their opposition to this ad about toxic masculinity is to question their masculinity. Even if you have a valid point it's not the kind of message people are going to be open to, nor is it meant to be. Not in the way it is being presented. Belittling and attempts at verbal emasculation are actually counterproductive to any persuasive minded goal.

The bickering is more about people who dislike each other trying to **** each other off and "own" each other than it is about any message behind this ad. The ad is meant to anger people who SJWs want to see being angry so they can troll them about it. There's no positive intent behind it. It's what happens when people whose agenda is more political than economical are put in charge of marketing campaigns.

And the notion that "all publicity is good publicity" is not a universal truth. Ask any baker who has gotten publicity about their policies on baking custom cakes for homosexual weddings, or any small business in general that has felt the wrath of an SJW negative publicity storm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 06:58 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,644 posts, read 26,389,506 times
Reputation: 12655
Quote:
Originally Posted by mash123 View Post
Ok.
What would you say about a bra company add that talks zilch about the quality of their bras, but lecturing women not to behave like sluts, not to be snakes at the work-place and to stop falsely accusing men of rape?
Does it come in a 34-c ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,235 posts, read 18,590,367 times
Reputation: 25806
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
If men are the "stronger sex," why are so many men so upset about this ad?

Being strong means being confident. Are you confident in your masculinity? If this commercial makes you so uncomfortable that you're complaining about it or even changing your shopping habits, the answer is no.

We aren't allowed to comment on things in which we disagree? We are just supposed to be quiet, and go sit in the corner?

Many people see a societal trend here of which this is just one example. It is evident in the Media, Social Media, Entertainment, Education, and Corporate Advertising where they use constant Virtue Signaling to prop up their favorited group du jour. It is condescending the those groups, and insulting to he other groups they demonize.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 07:00 AM
Status: "Moldy Tater Gangrene, even before Moscow Marge." (set 4 days ago)
 
Location: Dallas, TX
5,790 posts, read 3,602,372 times
Reputation: 5697
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
If men are the "stronger sex," why are so many men so upset about this ad?

Being strong means being confident. Are you confident in your masculinity? If this commercial makes you so uncomfortable that you're complaining about it or even changing your shopping habits, the answer is no.
Because certain males with high informal social status (within their broadly-based social circle, if nowhere else but just as easily can still get granted high status well outside the said social circle) think they ought to make the social rules for what or who is acceptable or unacceptable. Then when society challenges that long-held assumption, they have absolutely maniacal objections to losing that social privilege (formal or informal). This is especially true when they put down, belittle, or dish outright indignities to others that they themselves would never accept for a millisecond. In this case, calling them out for mistreating others who are in a weaker or lower status position.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 07:01 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,644 posts, read 26,389,506 times
Reputation: 12655
Quote:
Originally Posted by engineman View Post
I will just keep on using my Schick razor.


Bro...that ain't even cool!

Am I doing it right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 07:05 AM
 
46,964 posts, read 26,005,972 times
Reputation: 29454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absolom View Post
But they're making ads highlighting the problems that you want to focus on.
I'm not here to praise Gillette, only to mock those "men"who compete to see who can make themselves out as being the biggest victim. Anyone feeling attacked by that ad should probably look into how he can better shore up his masculinity, because damn! - those are some fragile egos, boys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Camberville
15,866 posts, read 21,452,288 times
Reputation: 28216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
We aren't allowed to comment on things in which we disagree? We are just supposed to be quiet, and go sit in the corner?

Many people see a societal trend here of which this is just one example. It is evident in the Media, Social Media, Entertainment, Education, and Corporate Advertising where they use constant Virtue Signaling to prop up their favorited group du jour. It is condescending the those groups, and insulting to he other groups they demonize.

Maybe you should try smiling more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top