Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
More than 4 million people in and out of government have security clearances of one level or another. Imagine if everyone had Comey's sense of grandiosity and decided to send confidential or FOUO documents to their security-cleared buddies to leak to the press.
"heir security-cleared buddies to leak to the press."
I question the claim that these press people HAVE clearances. Don't know why they would have clearances.
Agreed. As I stated earlier, if he was some nobody contractor or some junior enlisted member, he might get into trouble for that. History has shown us, time and again, that simply doesn't happen to senior - in this case VERY senior - folks.
Well, no. You only need to be "read into/read off of" for SCI material.
However, you're right, having a clearance is only one piece of the puzzle. You also have to have a "need to know". I have a TS/SCI clearance, I can't stroll into the Pentagon or the CIA and say "Let me see all your TS information.", you're 100% correct there.
We had an office in one of the lower level spaces in the Pentagon. lost 4 co-workers on 9-11.
Whenever I had to go their I to get a badges for each section I entered for a total of 6. My neck hurt from wearing so many.
If you violate policy, what going to happen to you? I'm not sure what AUP you signed, but mine clearly states that if I break policy, it can be disclosed to law enforcement authorities for prosecution violations.
I'm not sure what AUP you signed, but mine clearly states that if I break policy, it can be disclosed to law enforcement authorities for prosecution violations.
Sure, and as I have repeatedly said - this almost never results in criminal charges for senior people in these types of scenarios. Agreed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee
Again, it does not matter, what he did was while he was.
See above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee
Sorry, I misunderstood your sarcasm....as stated earlier, use the smilies to the left of where you type.
I have not employed any sarcasm in this thread. I don't think.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee
I go back about 3 pages maybe 4 and maybe the first 2 pages...but that's it...don't like it, there is an ignore button..
Hey, if you want to be lazy and ignorant, knock yourself out. Expect some snark when you quote me and make references/ask questions about stuff I've already addressed in a given thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee
And it happens all the time in gun threads...I have no clue what I'm talking about (from anti-gunners), but oh well.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee
You said: "You misunderstand - I'm parroting the claim I quoted" that's called being sarcastic....
Repeating someone's chosen turn of phrase is not sarcasm.
Where have I ever said that senior leadership should get away with the things they get away with?
I have definitely said "I'm not surprised", I don't ever remember saying "I'm glad" or "this is good/right/how it should be".
Maybe you can quote the post I'm forgetting?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
