Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Evidently, you've never read throughout the Talmud.
I haven't, though you can't know that from my post, which was seeing the funny side of the earlier post rather than making any theological observation on it. You are too eager to score a point that you din't stop to understand my post.
I haven't, though you can't know that from my post, which was seeing the funny side of the earlier post rather than making any theological observation on it. You are too eager to score a point that you din't stop to understand my post.
I actually wasn't attempting to score any points. Many people haven't read it, but if you would have read any of it then you would know there's nothing funny about your post because it's true.
It's just building, forming, shaping, and putting together, after all...that we've never been able to duplicate.
I thought there were like 10+ Egyptian pyramids. How could we duplicate something without copying it? How could we do it for free and not at great cost?
Did the Egyptians build our marvelous concrete and steel buildings, taller then any tower they could achieve themselves? No.
I thought there were like 10+ Egyptian pyramids. How could we duplicate something without copying it? How could we do it for free and not at great cost?
Did the Egyptians build our marvelous concrete and steel building? Taller then any tower they could achieve themselves? No.
A meaningless distinction, really.
Have you ever studied the various ancient megaliths from around the globe? They are hewn from stone... some from top to bottom.
I actually wasn't attempting to score any points. Many people haven't read it, but if you would have read any of it then you would know there's nothing funny about your post because it's true.
I have to doubt that it is as it appears, but if it was it would be even funnier. And of course you were trying to score a point. Re -read your post. If you can't see it, you're the only one that can't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerZ
Are you saying we couldn't do that today, with a lot of slaves and a few decades on our hands?
Probably. It's astounding how easily Dainiken is hi -jacked by religious apologists under the impression that science not being able to explain how Incas cut stone with their bare hands somehow proves that God exists.
I have to doubt that it is as it appears, but if it was it would be even funnier.
Even funnier, for some, it's actually a practice.
Quote:
Probably. It's astounding how easily Dainiken, is hi -jacked by religious apologists under the impression that science not being able to explain how Incas cut stone with their bare hands somehow proves that God exists.
I'm not looking to prove any God exists. This is a discussion forum, not a cult following recruitment site.
No one should be at all surprised that ignorance and superstition dominated primitive human traditions and practices over 3000+ years ago.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arach Angle
it so funny, such a simple notion that is completely ignored when needed.
Perhaps it is too simple???
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.