Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why don't the USA and Canada does not have freedom of movement of people, just like Australia and New Zealand?
Fear of losing sovereignty and the Canadian way of life. The US has 9 times the population. This fear is made more potent since it's a lot easier to traverse between the US and Canada than it is NZ and Australia.
Very different to the situations for Australians who choose to live in NZ - no specials visas, immediate right to benefits, able to vote, no police state detention due to association.
A Kiwi would need to be aiding and abetting criminal or pretty serious anti social activities to be detained and deported "due to association".
Add the US and Ireland to the list and I’m down. It would be the best thing ever. If we could expand it beyond just Anglo countries it would be even better. Id like to see France, Italy, Germany, Spain and Scandinavaian countries added to the list.
Add the US and Ireland to the list and I’m down. It would be the best thing ever. If we could expand it beyond just Anglo countries it would be even better. Id like to see France, Italy, Germany, Spain and Scandinavaian countries added to the list.
You can't add France, Italy, Germany, Spain and Scandinavian countries, or it's called the European Union and they already have a goal on their own.
The US maybe if they ditch NAFTA, but unlikely as if NAFTA was not useful, why would that agreement even be of use to he US? Ireland is tied to the EU so it's not happening, that's the whole "problem" the UK is going through with the hard boarder on Ireland and the Brexit.
You can't add France, Italy, Germany, Spain and Scandinavian countries, or it's called the European Union and they already have a goal on their own.
The US maybe if they ditch NAFTA, but unlikely as if NAFTA was not useful, why would that agreement even be of use to he US? Ireland is tied to the EU so it's not happening, that's the whole "problem" the UK is going through with the hard boarder on Ireland and the Brexit.
Is it really that problematic if countries are in multiple economic unions? Conflict of interest?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
