Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Canada
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-30-2019, 07:58 PM
 
518 posts, read 398,417 times
Reputation: 470

Advertisements

I absolutely love Michel & Lynda Thibodeau, they are the new heroes of our times and I admire them already more than our flop politicians
Michel & Lynda are COURAGEOUS while Air Canada is OUTRAGEOUS !
It's a shame that Air Canada is even allowed to fly to Québec, they should have been banned form entering Québécois airspace already years ago for violating Bill 101.

I just logged in to show my fierce & unstoppable support for this gorgeous couple and I'm totally fallen in love with the idea of suing all those organizations that neglect French and I'll join their hobby.



Also a big thank you to the judge who punished horrifying Air Canada 'cause they deserve to be punished after decades of having the audacity to disobey bilingualism
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-30-2019, 08:11 PM
 
Location: Boston, MA
3,973 posts, read 5,772,573 times
Reputation: 4738
I am all for cultural preservation of the French Language in French speaking parts of Quebec but not by way of frivolous lawsuits. The couple could have simply complained to Air Canada to modify their language provisions but they took it one step too far. It was an arrogant and divisive move on their part. Someone from Puerto Rico cannot sue an American airline because there are no signs in Spanish on an airplane. Someone from Hong Kong cannot demand a Mainland Chinese company print in traditional characters instead of or in addition to simplified characters or demand that there are Cantonese speakers on each flight to and from the Mainland. Corporations are more sensitive to customers needs than the past and many will provide signage in a foreign language or a bilingual flight attendant as a courtesy. Perhaps this was what Air Canada ought to have done but a lawsuit like this could actually discourage them from doing anymore than what they are doing and backfire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2019, 08:12 PM
 
Location: Toronto
2,801 posts, read 3,859,823 times
Reputation: 3154
Quote:
Originally Posted by PBeauchamp View Post
Don't be dramatic, BruSan.

Can I admit something to you?

You are one of my favorite posters.

In fact, one of the only ones that stand for something.

This is largely due to your usual wit, banter, and unwavering steadfastness in your beliefs.

In the last post you failed deliver neither wit nor banter. Steadfastness was nowhere to be found.


So the result is this:

There were no threats in the aforementioned post.

Characteristically, you may be exhibiting parcels of the renowned Canadian "inferiority complex".

A bit like a small man jumping to defence all too early.

My official statement is that no feelings were intended to be hurt.
That is the coolest attachment i have ever seen. Downloaded and ready for use! Was one sent to the Thibodeaus as well?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2019, 08:26 PM
 
Location: Montreal
542 posts, read 503,458 times
Reputation: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonsereed View Post
Not to nitpick but AC became fully privatized 30years ago !

When the gvnmt sold their stake to the public they also enacted a law forcing them to keep their head office in MTL

Feel free to resume your crusade now PB
Right, "privatized". Good to see you, jonsereed!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2019, 08:33 PM
 
Location: Montreal
542 posts, read 503,458 times
Reputation: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuebecOpec View Post
I absolutely love Michel & Lynda Thibodeau, they are the new heroes of our times and I admire them already more than our flop politicians
Michel & Lynda are COURAGEOUS while Air Canada is OUTRAGEOUS !
It's a shame that Air Canada is even allowed to fly to Québec, they should have been banned form entering Québécois airspace already years ago for violating Bill 101.

I just logged in to show my fierce & unstoppable support for this gorgeous couple and I'm totally fallen in love with the idea of suing all those organizations that neglect French and I'll join their hobby.



Also a big thank you to the judge who punished horrifying Air Canada 'cause they deserve to be punished after decades of having the audacity to disobey bilingualism
Classic!

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOkidd View Post
That is the coolest attachment i have ever seen. Downloaded and ready for use! Was one sent to the Thibodeaus as well?
TOkidd, I am glad to see someone has a sense of humor! Can you help your compatriots!? Be sure to spread the hurt feelings report, it's going to come in handy these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2019, 08:55 PM
 
2,869 posts, read 5,138,596 times
Reputation: 3668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
This is only the latest chapter in a long-running public relations and legal feud between this couple and Air Canada. If you analyse the whole thing based on seat belt buckles that only say LIFT you're missing the point.

And of course... why is it so difficult for Air Canada to have bilingual flight attendants on every single flight either to or from Quebec? They have flight attendants who speak Dutch on every flight to Amsterdam, don't they?
To be fair, I am pretty sure that couple is from NB and one of their complaints was about signs at the Fredericton airport.

That said, from a legal standpoint these are clearly not vexatious litigants, as the court actually ruled in their favour. As armchair judges and legislators we are obviously allowed to discuss this, but it wouldn’t hurt to actually try to understand what sort of legislation led to this award.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2019, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Québec
82 posts, read 71,155 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyyc View Post
If this doesn't meet the standard of vexatious litigant, I don't know what does.

The Federal Court has ordered Air Canada to pay $21,000 to an Ottawa couple for repeated violations of their French-language language rights, including seatbelts on which the instruction to "lift" the buckle was marked only in English.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/lynda-michel-thibodeau-french-language-rights-air-canada-1.5265126


As one of "those" anglos, it's things like this that annoy the crap out of me.
They made the correct ruling and Lynda & Michel Thibodeau did a fantastic job!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2019, 10:03 PM
 
Location: Gatineau, Québec
26,883 posts, read 38,040,463 times
Reputation: 11651
Quote:
Originally Posted by barneyg View Post
To be fair, I am pretty sure that couple is from NB and one of their complaints was about signs at the Fredericton airport.
.
I may be mistaken but I am pretty sure they live in Ottawa but are originally from the North Shore region of Quebec. Though yes Thibodeau is an Acadien name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2019, 10:05 PM
 
Location: Gatineau, Québec
26,883 posts, read 38,040,463 times
Reputation: 11651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Peasant View Post
I am all for cultural preservation of the French Language in French speaking parts of Quebec but not by way of frivolous lawsuits. The couple could have simply complained to Air Canada to modify their language provisions but they took it one step too far. .
They did complain to the flight attendant, and to Air Canada. In the first instance they were escorted off the plane by police upon arrival. In the second case they were repeatedly told to go to hell and given the runaround by Air Canada.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2019, 10:07 PM
 
Location: Gatineau, Québec
26,883 posts, read 38,040,463 times
Reputation: 11651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Peasant View Post
It was an arrogant and divisive move on their part. Someone from Puerto Rico cannot sue an American airline because there are no signs in Spanish on an airplane. Someone from Hong Kong cannot demand a Mainland Chinese company print in traditional characters instead of or in addition to simplified characters or demand that there are Cantonese speakers on each flight to and from the Mainland. .
Pretty sure there is no legal obligation to provide service in Spanish on US flights to and from Puerto Rico, or in Cantonese to or from Hong Kong.

This legal obligation (with respect to French) does exist for Air Canada. It's very clear in the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Canada

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top