Exclusive: Two women accused Herman Cain of inappropriate behavior (Congress, accuses, racism)

[jjwebbster]

Originally Posted by dixiegirl7

The accusation is just that he made a comment and a gesture of some sort. It hasn't even been revealed what it was. It sounds very sketchy and like it is being blown out of proportion to me.

All these accusations come from "Politico", a liberal
democratic news rag. They are on a par with "Move
On. org", another democratic propaganda site. The
Obama people would do about anything to smear
Cain. They see him as a real threat.

As I understand it, Cain called a few women (2 or 3)
"honey/baby" in a non sexual way. All this back in the
90's, while working for the pizza joint.

It is so redicilous it shouldn't have come up. It hardly
compares with something like John Edwards or Bill
Clinton. The whole thing is just another smear tactic
from the libs.




a

[dixiegirl7]

Originally Posted by Savoir Faire

Correction, Cain is a right wing Republican.

For the Christian Right, any Presidential candidate who isn't a gun toting bible thumping flat earther is considered a Muslim Marxist.

lol...I see your point, but not all are that way, many are though.

[Annie53]

Originally Posted by LuckyGem

Was Bill Clinton dead meat after Monicagate?

Was Kennedy dead meat after Marilyn?

Was Barney Frank dead meat after his apartment was used as a gay brothel?

All of the above involve WILLING partners.

Cain is being accused of sexual harassment.....that means the women involved were not willing partners.

BIG DIFFERENCE!

BTW....When you brought up Clinton, Kennedy and Frank's sexual escapades.....you forgot to include Rev. Martin Luther King Jr's.

[momonkey]

Originally Posted by Annie53

All of the above involve WILLING partners.

Cain is being accused of sexual harassment.....that means the women involved were not willing partners.

BIG DIFFERENCE!

BTW....When you brought up Clinton, Kennedy and Frank's sexual escapades.....you forgot to include Rev. Martin Luther King Jr's.

With the exception of JFK, the other cases have been proven to be true.

In the case of Cain, these are accusations based on perceptions.

In other words, office gossip.


"Cain is being accused of sexual harassment.....that means the women involved were not willing partners."

Since you weren't there, how do you know what did or did not take place?

The only thing I know for sure is these women were paid a lot of money to feel harassed.

[Savoir Faire]

Originally Posted by dixiegirl7

lol...I see your point, but not all are that way, many are though.

I was using hyperbole. But let's be honest, it's really hard to be a right wing politician when you have known sex scandals. The Christian right looks down upon PUBLIC philandering. This is what sunk Newt's chances of POTUS, alongside with the fact that he looks like a giant baby.

If the names of the accusers are unknown, how can the nutjobs on here claim it's some liberal/Democrat/Communist conspiracy? Maybe the women are Republicans.

[Savoir Faire]

Originally Posted by jjwebbster

All these accusations come from "Politico", a liberal
democratic news rag. They are on a par with "Move
On. org", another democratic propaganda site.

The accusations are from 2 women. Politico is reporting the story, along with 2,149 websites, all Marxist surely.

Republican presidential hopeful Herman Cain accused of 'sexually suggestive behaviour' | World news | guardian.co.uk

[Annie53]

Originally Posted by momonkey

With the exception of JFK, the other cases have been proven to be true.

In the case of Cain, these are accusations based on perceptions.

In other words, office gossip.


"Cain is being accusedof sexual harassment.....that means the women involved were not willing partners."

Since you weren't there, how do you know what did or did not take place?

The only thing I know for sure is these women were paid a lot of money to feel harassed.

Did I say he did it......or did I say he was ACCUSED of sexual harassment?

To make it easy for you.....I highlighted it for you.

READING IS FUNDAMENTAL

[Annie53]

Originally Posted by Savoir Faire

I was using hyperbole. But let's be honest, it's really hard to be a right wing politician when you have known sex scandals. The Christian right looks down upon PUBLIC philandering. This is what sunk Newt's chances of POTUS, alongside with the fact that he looks like a giant baby.

If the names of the accusers are unknown, how can the nutjobs on here claim it's some liberal/Democrat/Communist conspiracy? Maybe the women are Republicans.

And........ maybe one of his Republican opponents is responsible for bringing these accusations to light.

[sailordave]

Originally Posted by Annie53

All of the above involve WILLING partners.

Cain is being accused of sexual harassment.....that means the women involved were not willing partners.

BIG DIFFERENCE!

BTW....When you brought up Clinton, Kennedy and Frank's sexual escapades.....you forgot to include Rev. Martin Luther King Jr's.

Clinton was accused of rape and multiple cases of sexual harassment.

[Annie53]

Originally Posted by sailordave

Clinton was accused of rape and multiple cases of sexual harassment.

There's that pesky word again.....ACCUSED.