Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-17-2012, 03:35 AM
 
4,278 posts, read 5,177,911 times
Reputation: 2375

Advertisements

I would say it was a tie. Obama seemed like he wanted to be there this time, but offered no plan to turn the economy around other than raising taxes. He did not understand the basic economic theory of supply and demand for gas prices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2012, 03:37 AM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,221,236 times
Reputation: 6553
Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h View Post
Misleading title... I'll say it first. Obama owned Romney

and then you proceeded to nearly make the case that Romney won.
Well because I am not a hard liner I can give credit to both sides. That is difficult for hard liners to grasp I know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 03:43 AM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,745,966 times
Reputation: 15667
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Once again, we see a democratic failure. Obama was more passionate about his views, but was ALWAYS rebutted with the fact that he had promised such measures four years ago and failed to deliver the desired results.

Obama was simply rehashing his promises of four years ago. The problem this time was that he has a record of four years of failure which could be readily recounted (and Romney did!).

Obama was more passionate and did not appear as a zombie, as he did in the first debate. However, in regard to factual responses and solutions, he was wavering and wondering, just as he was in the first debate.

It was clear that we have had an empty suit in the White House for the last four years who cannot explain what he has done or articulate what he will do differently. This was a stronger showing for Obama (one could not do any worse), but was a clear policy defeat.

The emperor has no clothes.
Obama was the same empty suit...Romney won on substance and dealt with the "kid" who needed "mommies" help trying to win!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 03:44 AM
 
Location: The Beautiful Pocono Mountains
5,450 posts, read 8,762,566 times
Reputation: 3002
Quote:
Originally Posted by totsuka View Post
I would say it was a tie. Obama seemed like he wanted to be there this time, but offered no plan to turn the economy around other than raising taxes. He did not understand the basic economic theory of supply and demand for gas prices.
That blew my mind. Supply is up, then why are has prices so damned high???

I get trying to look toward the future with energy, but you can't put all those eggs in one basket which is what Obama did. We can't be bankrupt now for the sake if the future.
Changes need to be made gradually and not at the expense of everyone now.
We keep doing this, there will be no future to contend with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 03:53 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,418,524 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maabus1999 View Post
Proof that Obama hit a nerve tonight (aka did very well): Go look at the P&C and Election board. They are lit up like a X-mas tree with people screaming insults about the moderator and taking her words out of context to the nth degree.
No it's bias. She later admits Romney was right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 03:54 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,013,481 times
Reputation: 62204
Default How Come Questioners had to Read Their Debate Questions?

How come all of the people asking questions had to read them? Aren't those supposedly their questions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 03:55 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,671,534 times
Reputation: 9174
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
No it's bias. She later admits Romney was right.
lol. It's obvious liberals have a hard time keeping up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 03:58 AM
 
3,448 posts, read 3,132,726 times
Reputation: 478
This is all about Obama not sending aid when a cry for help was in motion, well known and refused in a ridiculed way after many many requests.

There cannot be any evidence or substantial report showing the terrorism was caused by an internet clip because we know it was not the cause...

therefore, if there is no evidence for the cause being an internet clip...then how was Obama ...CONVINCED IT WAS CAUSED BY AN INTERNET CLIP....therefore he must of made the whole thing up. Where is the intelligence report, where is the evidence that it was an internet clip that caused him to say these things for two weeks ...( BS...he out and out made it completely up and lied...causing all that unrest, dollars and embarrassment in the whole world, because the agents in distant lands needed serious help and were ignored out of the preferred business for the day. Total non interest in the serious events including repeated requests for protection which we know, is a high WH priority issue. But not for Obama.

Last edited by stargazzer; 10-17-2012 at 04:16 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 03:59 AM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,472,102 times
Reputation: 9435
Empty suit? That means you just don`t like him and you`re unwilling or unable to criticize him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 03:59 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,382 posts, read 60,575,206 times
Reputation: 60996
I didn't watch last night but likely so the questioners wouldn't get tongue tied when it was their turn.

The format I've seen the most is that questions are written down and turned in where a team of people from the debate/forum sponsors go through them and weed out any duplicates or "Are still beating your wife?" type questions and the Moderator reads the questions to the candidates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top