***Presidential Debate #2 Tuesday 10/16/12*** (unemployed, vote, wages, illegal)

[VTHokieFan]

Originally Posted by TempesT68

Willard ended up making an ass out of himself again in front of millions of people. It was pretty despicable how he acted like he could care less what an audience member's question was for him when they were speaking to him. He arrogantly and disrespectfully deflected away back to another, completely unrelated issue.

That plus Obama stating "can you say that again and louder Candy?" when Willard was caught spreading lies again was the highlight of the night

After Biden kicking ass and now Obama, I can't want to see the new poll numbers

Let's just call the election now.

[Max Sterling]

Originally Posted by hawkeye2009

Well, you had best start your trek to MO.

Obama needed a TKO and he lost. Romney clearly appears presidential and has solutions to the problems that face us. Obama simply said "everything over the last four year is okay- stay the course".

The 30 million unemployed and the 50 million on foodstamps (not to mention all Americans losing 8fi in wages and 40% in savings) would beg do differ.


Game OVER. Obama has officially lost.

Again with the amnesia that the recession hit the hardest right around when Obama took office. This little fact really doesn't register in Republican minds does it?

Put it this way, if there was no recession and four years later this was the state of the economy and the country, then you could validly claim Obama and the Democrats didn't do the job. But to blame EVERYTHING on the Dems without mentioning WHY AND HOW we got into this position in the first place is simply WRONG AND UNFAIR.

And let me ask you, if McCain had won the election 4 years ago, do you seriously believe he and the GOP would've did much better under the same conditions that Obama and the Dems faced? I find that hard to believe that they would have and very likely we'd be doing even worse. Fact is whoever won the last presidential election was in for a mega sh$tstorm and in a way, the GOP were lucky they didn't win otherwise they would have no one to blame this time around.

[walidm]

Originally Posted by pghquest

Those people WONT vote for him.. Do you really think people on welfare are going to vote Romney?

Come on, be honest..

What makes you think large populations in Appalachia, in Corporate boardrooms, and throughout the South won't vote for Romney?

Let's hope you weren't thinking only poor folks receive Welfare.

[floridasandy]

are we going to try and pretend now that an american filmmaker wasn't being blamed for these murders initially?

this administration is beyond clueless, and i just can't see people defending this level of incompetence.

again, who is taking responsibility and what does that actually involve again?

we will probably see the same level of "responsibility" we saw with executive privilege in fast and furious-because they don't WANT the truth.

we have a bunch of neophyte losers determining policy (and i supported hillary in the last election, so i think i am being pretty objective here).

[DJboutit]

Mega lying and even being called out on your lies makes you look a big time a hole. Also dogging a lot of the questions does not help either doing these 2 things you lose every time

[LordBalfor]

Originally Posted by pghquest

How can a building be on active duty? Hell, one would think you guys would be agreeing with me because I'm saying Obama was correct in not calling it a terrorist attacks.

Seems to me you seem to just want to argue..

Who cares about the BUILDING?

Sorry to see you have so little concern for the PEOPLE who were KILLED there.

Ken

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by urbanlife78

So it wasn't a terrorist attack?

Didnt I say that?

I'm saying Obama was correct in not calling it a terrorist attacks.

Once again I need to repeat myself to you.. Are you sure you're old enough to be posting here? Scary part is, I bet you vote, but cant comprehend english..

[LoveToRow]

Originally Posted by EdwardA

Transcript from the USA government. Acts is plural and not a specific act. So he really didn't refer to Libya as an act of terror specifically. That being said Mitt fumbled Libya and once Obama owned Libya he should have moved on.

The "fumble" is going to benefit Romney in the end. We're going to continue to talk about Libya over the next few days. Oblama's campaign won't like that because they don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to Libya.

Plus, there is one debate left and guess what the topic is? Yup, foreign policy.

[urbanlife78]

Originally Posted by pghquest

Didnt I say that?

I'm saying Obama was correct in not calling it a terrorist attacks.

Once again I need to repeat myself to you.. Are you sure you're old enough to be posting here? Scary part is, I bet you vote, but cant comprehend english..

You are right, I missed the part where you said you are agreeing with the president, I am not use to you doing that.

Well then, now that we all know this wasn't any form of terror related attack, we can all move on.

So who won that debate?

[Taratova]

Romney cleaned Obama's clock. And Obama is a liar and still dirty.