Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do You Agree With Trump's Decision to Skip Fox Debate
Yes - MSM is worthless 54 26.21%
No - Trump should participate 33 16.02%
Doesn't matter, He Will Win Election 55 26.70%
Good Riddance 64 31.07%
Voters: 206. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-27-2016, 07:55 AM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,337,216 times
Reputation: 8066

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post

This election cycle has become completely about ENTERTAINMENT and not about actual policy debate.
Agreed. Which is why I won't watch anymore debates until the primaries winnow the field down. Then we'll move past the entertainment stage into something more substantial.

 
Old 01-27-2016, 07:57 AM
 
4,412 posts, read 3,961,711 times
Reputation: 2326
No love lost for either Trump or FOX News, but I understand why he'd boycott the debate.
It was obvious in the first debate that Kelly's job was to throw softballs at JEB and Rubio and attempt to make Trump look bad. He was the only person on that stage that was asked anything resembling a real question, and they weren't good questions at that. It does him little benefit to be there, and he's not about to help FOX's ratings by participating.
 
Old 01-27-2016, 07:58 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,654,666 times
Reputation: 21097
Why is Trump considered a coward for skipping debate on FOX when Obama did the same thing in 2007?
 
Old 01-27-2016, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Somewhere
8,069 posts, read 6,976,359 times
Reputation: 5654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post
Last election cycle, people accused others on here of being paid to write posts against a certain candidate. I thought those people were wrong. This election cycle, I'm thinking I was wrong about the last election cycle and people being paid to write posts on here against certain candidates.
Haha. Yeah right. How amusing.

You can check the registration dates of most of us. We didn't subscribe to this forum 5 or 7 months ago.
 
Old 01-27-2016, 08:00 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,528,817 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
The media has been "running hit pieces" on every candidate since Lincoln, for crying out loud. Trump isn't special. He doesn't get to be treated any different than other front-runners have experienced since our country began. The whole election process is a trial by fire and Trump is proving he can't handle the heat, which means he's not suited to be the leader of the free world.
I agree with the central idea of what you are saying. But what 'hit pieces' have the 'media' - not to be confused with the other candidates - been running on Trump? And asking Donald Trump about his previous comments and conduct is not a 'hit piece'. If you cannot ask candidates about these matters, what in the world can you ask them about?

These candidates may be ashamed to be confronted with these sorts of questions, as Donald Trump clearly is, but in that case the problem is not with the media or whoever asking about what the candidate did or said. The problem is what the candidate did or said and that the candidate did or said it.

For their previous comments and conduct, these candidates should very certainly be held accountable to the voters. Each and every one of them.
 
Old 01-27-2016, 08:10 AM
 
Location: Somewhere
8,069 posts, read 6,976,359 times
Reputation: 5654
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post

You all realize of course, that Trump's decision not to do the debate doesn't just hurt Fox News. The other candidates may be dreaming of 20 million eyeballs and ears on them but now may get half that amount listening to what they say. That's the real reason Cruz challenged Trump to a debate. He's got the most to lose. Trump should tell Cruz he's on to him.
20 million? LOL

Have you checked the ratings for the last republican debates? I'm sure you have but they don't fit your agenda so you are not bombarding us with your "statistics".

The ratings have dropped dramatically since the second republican debate, and that was while your emotional candidate was still going. Your candidate is not as special as some of you think.
 
Old 01-27-2016, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Somewhere
8,069 posts, read 6,976,359 times
Reputation: 5654
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucFan View Post
Now the typical phase II of damage control for Trump: Veterans group donation and vilification of Megyn Kelly and Faux News.
Is Trump gonna sue Fox again?
 
Old 01-27-2016, 08:14 AM
 
Location: Tampa, FL
27,798 posts, read 32,468,462 times
Reputation: 14611
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Except that it isn't an "act."
Its the reality TV model of keeping the storyline changing. Trump finds a way to be in the news no matter what.
 
Old 01-27-2016, 08:15 AM
 
Location: The #1 sunshine state, Arizona.
12,169 posts, read 17,653,635 times
Reputation: 64104
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
I don't think they set "him" up persay, I do think they're trying to set up a potential car crash to draw eyeballs to another non-debate debate and it may have just backfired.
Ask yourself this, what chops does Kelly have that lends her to be a moderator of anything? Is she a financial wiz? Is she a foreign policy expert? How about a political expert?

Nope, she's a tabloid news show person. So why put her on the stage? Why, to hopefully ignite a new controversy that they can yap about for the next several news cycles or at the least fan the flames of the old controversy that most have pretty much forgotten about.

I think Fox is realizing that the "debates" this cycle have turned more into an insult fest and less about actual substance and wants those drive by eyeballs.
R=$ (ratings equal dollars)
Fox will be losing a nice chunk of their market share. CNN has been broadcasting Trump's live rallies, while Fox stays with their regular afternoon, and evening programing.

As an aside, Ted Cruz offered to have a one on one debate, Trump should agree to have a televised debate with Cruz tomorrow night, while the Fox debate airs.
 
Old 01-27-2016, 08:16 AM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,084,938 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElizaTeal View Post
Fox will be losing a nice chunk of their market share. CNN has been broadcasting Trump's live rallies, while Fox stays with their regular afternoon, and evening programing.

As an aside, Ted Cruz offered to have a one on one debate, Trump should agree to have a televised debate with Cruz tomorrow night, while the Fox debate airs.
Trump would never do that. He knows he'd end up looking like the idiot he is. Nope, Trump has shown us that running away is his preferred course of action.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top