Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You obviously didn't read this post quoted from the AP affiliate....I'd edit my original post to remove the word "stillborn" but it's too late, unconscious will suffice....
Doesn't say what you're claiming. Says the baby was delivered and when the EMTs arrived, 10 hours later, the baby was unconscious and non-responsive.
No where does it say she delivered a stillborn or unconscious baby. The links posted on this thread have the story.
The Point being - she waited 10 hours for help, with a dying baby, who might have been saved if the EMT's could have reached her 1, 2, 4, 6 HOURS before they actually arrived. We can agree with that, can't we? We can also agree the baby was NOT a stillborn.
You're very own link proves you wrong, the baby was not born unconscious;
Quote:
Initially, dispatchers assigned the call a low priority because the expectant mother hadn't reported that either she or the baby were in distress
An unconscious baby, right after birth, would be deemed in "distress".
Doesn't say what you're claiming. Says the baby was delivered and when the EMTs arrived, 10 hours later, the baby was unconscious and non-responsive.
No where does it say she delivered a stillborn or unconscious baby.
Well now I know you must not have learned to read braille well enough, either that or
you need your eyes checked... the article states EXACTLY what I quoted.
Well now I know you must not have learned to read braille well enough, either that or
you need your eyes checked... the article states EXACTLY what I quoted.
The baby was stillborn? NO.
The baby was born unconscious? No, not according to this on your link;
Quote:
Initially, dispatchers assigned the call a low priority because the expectant mother hadn't reported that either she or the baby were in distress
According to your link, when the EMT got the call the baby was unconscious, they were at the hotel in 12 minutes, which means the baby was not in any distress many hours BEFORE they got that last call. So from birth to approx 9 hours 45 minutes later, the baby was well.
On the count of three, we shall chant this in unison:
Unions are bad! Unions are commies! Unions are bad! Unions are commies!
One....two....three
You know, the only thing we really learned from this episode is that the leadership of one New York City employee union is composed of really defective people who caused great damage to the people who pay their wages.
That unions generally are designed to raise wages above market value and thereby depress employment and hurt the rest of us via higher prices is not pertinent to the despicable story from NY.
Who is going to "pay" for the known 4 murders that took place in this?
Why do I think that this investigation will be a up and will say that it's nobody's fault other than BS?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
up and will say that it's nobody's fault other than BS?
