Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-03-2013, 02:54 PM
 
334 posts, read 451,113 times
Reputation: 118

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane View Post
Parents can teach their kids whatever morals they choose. School has no more business interfering with that than it does with religion.

Oh parents can teach their children whatever they want, all I was saying is WHY they keep their children from interacted with the world.

 
Old 04-03-2013, 02:55 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 6,734,327 times
Reputation: 2916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonarchist View Post
Sex is the biological exchange of "data".

By comparison of the anatomical differences between coneheads and humans, with the main difference being that coneheads have no lower orifices or lower protuberances, a lesson could be learned about the mental sexuation occurring between two upper protuberances exchanging frisbeed vaginas.

The liberals want to destroy imagination, creativity and human potential, in words, they want to create a world of dregs and droids.
Oi vei. Take that mirror down asap, dude! You're beginning to describe us the way you are!
 
Old 04-03-2013, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,219 posts, read 22,371,062 times
Reputation: 23858
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
Well, I'd assume with sexual education there will be a lower birth rate, in turn resulting in less people on welfare...

...Right?
It's a possibility. It's also possible AIDS won't get passed around as much, that other sexually transmitted diseases will become less common, that little kids can actually describe what happened if they are molested, and bullying may decrease.

Lots of moral perversion in all of that, according to the OP.
 
Old 04-03-2013, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
8,346 posts, read 7,046,395 times
Reputation: 2874
Quote:
Originally Posted by butkus51 View Post
Take your rant and deflection elsewhere BUDDY! Sex ed does not prevent a damn freak from doing what happened to that poster no matter what you claim. Cops told us about possible pedos. Our gym teacher taught us sex ed. You don't like my point? Too bad. Ignore it.
Complaining about ranting and deflecting while...ranting and deflecting is quite counter-productive.

I fully support teaching kids in elementary school about good touch bad touch and the differences between girls and boys.
 
Old 04-03-2013, 03:04 PM
 
Location: On the border of off the grid
3,179 posts, read 3,166,570 times
Reputation: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
They are not discussing intercourse with 5 year olds!!!!!

Show me proof that they are. I have shown you proof that they AREN'T.
Here's your proof - the "sexuality education" being taught in Chicago Public Schools and elsewhere around the country is based on UNESCO's Sexuality Education:

http://legacy.avemarialaw.edu/ILJ/as...hea.Braden.pdf


Quote:
B. Sexuality in UNESCO’s International Guidelines
According to UNESCO’s International Guidelines, human
sexuality is “a process that comprises physical, psychological,
emotional, social and cultural dimensions.”44 Furthermore, human
sexuality is “inextricably linked to the development of one’s gender
identity . . . by the transmission of cultural values from one generation
to the next that forms a critical part of socialization [including] values
related to gender and sexuality.”45 Similar to UNESCO’s Technical
Guidelines, the International Guidelines also state “being sexual is an
important part of many people’s lives.”46 Human sexuality is seen as
“a source of pleasure and comfort and a way of expressing affection and love.”47
Human sexuality is equated to the act of intercourse;
therefore, UNESCO justifies the importance of comprehensive
sexuality education because it “prioritizes the acquisition and
reinforcement of values such as reciprocity, equality, and respect that
are prerequisites for healthier and safer sexual and social
relationships.”48 Comprehensive sexuality education purports to
create healthier and safer relationships by informing young people
(ages 5 through18) about sexually transmitted infections, namely,
HIV/AIDS.49
 
Old 04-03-2013, 03:09 PM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,385,313 times
Reputation: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by TapperCheck View Post
How does teaching human reproduction do any of that?

I think you have that backwards. But maybe you were home schooled and your parents never had THAT talk with you. There are books that will explain it.
The best time to INSTRUCT is at the appropriate time.

Those damned liberals are trying to confuse fun with procreation.

They've almost gone over to the other side.

Up to a time, the only thing persons need to know about their penis' and vaginas' is that they are for peeing. Anything further, prematurely, would be mental molestation, especially when "the group" derives gratification from the "instruction". The "group" seems to be practicing postcocious vicariational gratification. It is group child molestation. The kids don't stand a chance. They'll all grow up to be metrosexual nazi droids. They'll be doing it for der fodderland, as fodder themselves.

Lucky for polar bears they don't have that problem.
 
Old 04-03-2013, 03:20 PM
 
19,642 posts, read 12,231,401 times
Reputation: 26440
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinsterRufus View Post
They're already reading and writing in Kindergarten. And a kid in my child's Kindergarten class DOES have two mommies. And, kids are already using words for body parts (which are not the official terms, by a long shot). They aren't stupid, they know everyone has them. Might as well know what they're called, and that there's nothing wrong or shameful about it.
They are in kindergarten to learn about school stuff and to get along together in preparation for first grade.

Why should they have to learn and be expected to use these official anatomical terms... at 4/5 years old...Why? It's not shameful to know those words but also totally unnecessary to teach them to kids that age, it's just pointless unless there is another agenda, and we all know there is another agenda.

It really does hit the pervert level and IMO is abusive to start this with these babies.
 
Old 04-03-2013, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,211,524 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by ObserverNY View Post
Here's your proof - the "sexuality education" being taught in Chicago Public Schools and elsewhere around the country is based on UNESCO's Sexuality Education:

http://legacy.avemarialaw.edu/ILJ/as...hea.Braden.pdf
Have you seen the curriculum? Because I posted an article with actual CPS employees discussing what would be covered for 5 Y/O children. Intercourse was not on that list.
 
Old 04-03-2013, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
8,346 posts, read 7,046,395 times
Reputation: 2874
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane View Post
It really does hit the pervert level
Only if you think sayign the word penis is perverted, and if that is the case, then it's best to just keep your children in the cave so they aren't exposed to the ebils of language.
 
Old 04-03-2013, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike View Post
It's a possibility. It's also possible AIDS won't get passed around as much, that other sexually transmitted diseases will become less common, that little kids can actually describe what happened if they are molested, and bullying may decrease.

Lots of moral perversion in all of that, according to the OP.
Right..like they haven't been saying that for years now.
That's why they started sex ed in middle school as opposed to high school.
When that didn't work they started sex ed in upper elementary (5th grade) as opposed to middle school.
Still not working so let's start in kindergarten now.

Well where do we go from here when it still doesn't work to get the STD numbers down ?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top