Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Any or all that infringes one's 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
Again, automobiles kill more people than do guns, it isn't even a Constitutional Right to have an automobile, yet a background check isn't required to buy/lease one.
The Obama team reviewed and supported this DHS initiative to block second amendment rights to tens of thousands of American citizens who ended up on a terrorist watch list WITHOUT DUE PROCESS. What kind of Presidential "team" would overlook the Second AND Fifth Amendments????
Show the text, and we'll take a look. Would it make to read it first before commenting on it?
I just don't understand what's so bad about having to have an id to buy a firearm and undergo a background check.
I would think law abiding gun owners would embrace this.
The way it is now when shootings happen the focus as a whole becomes all about gun control. But look at it this way, if Obama implements a few common sense gun reforms, the next time a shooting happens gun owners can then say well see even with more gun control shootings still happen.
Any or all that infringes one's 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
Again, automobiles kill more people than do guns, it isn't even a Constitutional Right to have an automobile, yet a background check isn't required to buy/lease one.
Yet, you can't even point out one point that "infringes" on the 2nd Amendment. Not one point.
Obama addressed the beyond tired automobile comparison, if you can bother to actually read or watch what he said.
The Obama team reviewed and supported this DHS initiative to block second amendment rights to tens of thousands of American citizens who ended up on a terrorist watch list WITHOUT DUE PROCESS. What kind of Presidential "team" would overlook the Second AND Fifth Amendments????
It's actually the 2nd and 6th Amendment. And Obama's DOJ has violated the 1st Amendment, as well, with her "we'll prosecute anti-Muslim speech" declaration.
So, Lynch is already violating the Constitution and Obama consults her on what he can do Constitutionally on gun control?
Any or all that infringes one's 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
Again, automobiles kill more people than do guns, it isn't even a Constitutional Right to have an automobile, yet a background check isn't required to buy/lease one.
Then you are OK with psychopaths, sociopaths, convicted felons, etc. being able to buy weapons? Do you think that would be good for the well-being of our citizens?
In order to drive a car, one must have a license and training on how to drive a car. No comparison.
As President Obama said, what about our other rights? The right to peaceful assembly (theatre shooting), the right to live one's life (Sandy Hook)?
What about THOSE rights? They are less important than someone's desire to shoot people and having the means to do so?
I just don't understand what's so bad about having to have an id to buy a firearm and undergo a background check.
I would think law abiding gun owners would embrace this.
The way it is now when shootings happen the focus as a whole becomes all about gun control. But look at it this way, if Obama implements a few common sense gun reforms, the next time a shooting happens gun owners can then say well see even with more gun control shootings still happen.
You already do.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.