Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-31-2017, 04:38 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
PP facilities are located in areas that already have a HUGE overlap with numerous taxpayer-funded Family Planning Clinics. As such, they're redundant and unnecessary. If PPs were located in poor rural areas, that would be different, but they're not.
They provide a service, women use them for a reason. Now you're just making up that they are redundant and can be easily replaced, that is not true at all. Many rural areas do not have any overlap and even if they are located in the vicinity the other clinics are not prepared to handle the workload.


PP provides family planning and health services to around 65% of these low income recipients, that number is in the millions, you've been on too many pro-life websites it you believe they can be replaced. Show me a study that was proves your point, these congressmen that voted to defund should have a report, I mean they wouldn't have passed this bill without having a factual study in hand?? Did you happen to notice the bill was passed with practically no debate, now why would that be?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-31-2017, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katarina Witt View Post
And using one's insurance, e.g. Medicaid, to obtain family planning services is being responsible.



I don't think you understand the ACA. Medicaid expansion is part of it.
Very few red states bought into the Medicaid expansion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 04:47 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
They provide a service, women use them for a reason. Now you're just making up that they are redundant and can be easily replaced, that is not true at all. Many rural areas do not have any overlap and even if they are located in the vicinity the other clinics are not prepared to handle the workload.
Where are the rural PPs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 04:53 PM
 
2,924 posts, read 1,588,251 times
Reputation: 2498
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedZin View Post
The poorest, reddest states will use the abortion monster to keep PP clinics from staying open and providing gynecological services and mammograms to poor women.

States' rights is code for "red states will screw it up."

See: Confederacy
You know the Democrats created the Confederacy, don't you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Where are the rural PPs?

Here look for your self.


So where's the study that there will be no impact.


https://www.plannedparenthood.org/ab...nters-by-state
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 05:08 PM
 
8,924 posts, read 5,629,144 times
Reputation: 12560
Pence only does what his wife who he calls "mother" says to do...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 05:11 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Here look for your self.
I did. PPs aren't located in rural areas. They're located in urbanized areas or urban clusters (Fed Gov definitions), EXACTLY where many more times the number of taxpayer-funded Family Planning Clinics already exist.

https://www.hrsa.gov/ruralhealth/abo...efinition.html

PP is redundant and unnecessary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 05:27 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,295,922 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Not my job to guarantee one's quality of life.

I do want them to have the opportunity.

You guys act like no one has ever made a quality life out of tough life circumstances.

It's all doom and gloom because your pet issue has been knocked down a peg and will need to find some other funding. Welcome to the real world.
The federal government does not pay Planned Parenthood for abortions. You apparently want to kill Planned Parenthood because they provide abortions without a thought or care about who, if anyone, will provide the non-abortion services that P/P currently provides.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 05:33 PM
 
8,893 posts, read 5,375,111 times
Reputation: 5697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post

The ACA does not cover those below the threshold.
What threshold are you speaking of?

The ACA mandates people to have insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 05:36 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,295,922 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by MongooseHugger View Post
You know the Democrats created the Confederacy, don't you?
They did. Those Democrats also were the great great great grandfathers of a large part of the base of the current Republican Party in the South.

Party labels change, but the South remains as resistant to change as ever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top